Abstract
Background and Objectives Hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are a heterogeneous group of rare neurodegenerative diseases, characterized by a progressive spastic paraparesis. Currently, there is a HSP-specific clinician-reported outcome measure (CROM) called Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS). There are, however, no specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for HSP. In the present cohort study, we prospectively follow up a well-examined Austrian HSP cohort using validated rating scales and compared PROM with disease-specific and non–disease-specific CROM.
Methods Patients were recruited and followed up at the Center for Rare Movement Disorders, Innsbruck, Austria. CROM included the SPRS, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), Barthel Index (BI), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). PROM included the EQ-5D questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated for all scales at follow-up (FU) after 1 year.
Results A total of 55 patients (36 males) with HSP were included in the study. FU was performed for 30 patients (21 males). Apart from females reporting more problems in the EQ-5D domain of anxiety and depression (p = 0.008), other clinician-reported outcomes (CROs) or patient-reported outcomes (PROs) did not differ significantly across sex. SPRS showed significant correlations with SARA (p < 0.001), mainly driven by the gait item, as well as the BI. Although SPRS did not correlate with EQ-5D visual analogue scale and PHQ-9 scores, several EQ-5D domains correlated significantly with SPRS. At FU, SPRS showed the highest responsiveness (SRM 1.11), followed by SARA (SRM 0.47). Neither MMSE nor PRO significantly increased at FU.
Discussion In this study, we present an Austrian cohort of patients with HSP and a prospective study evaluating correlations of CRO and PRO as well as their progression. Demographics from our cohort are comparable with several other European cohort studies. Our data highlight the capabilities of the SPRS to show clinical progression and warrant consideration of ataxia rating scales such as SARA in HSP cohorts. We also show that the generic PROMs are not suitable to detect change in HSP, and thus, we propose to create a disease-specific PROM fully depicting the effect of HSP on the patients' lives.
Glossary
- 4SMD=
- 4-Stage Scale of Motor Disability;
- BI=
- Barthel Index;
- cHSP=
- complicated hereditary spastic paraplegia;
- CROM=
- clinician-reported outcome measure;
- FARS-ADL=
- Activities of Daily Living part of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale;
- FU=
- follow-up;
- HSP=
- hereditary spastic paraplegia;
- MMSE=
- Mini-Mental State Examination;
- PHQ-9=
- Patient Health Questionnaire 9;
- pHSP=
- pure hereditary spastic paraplegia;
- PROM=
- patient-reported outcome measure;
- QoL=
- quality of life;
- SARA=
- Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia;
- SPRS=
- Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale;
- SRM=
- standardized response mean;
- VAS=
- visual analogue scale
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/NG.
The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Associate Editor Alexandra Durr, MD, PhD.
- Received July 13, 2022.
- Accepted in final form November 18, 2022.
- Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
