Share

December 2021; 7 (6) Clinical/Scientific NotesOpen Access

Novel Mutation of the TGF-β 3 Protein (Loeys-Dietz Type 5) Associated With Aortic and Carotid Dissections

Case Report

Dargham Hussein, Christian Olsson, Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinson, Tiago Moreira
First published September 15, 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000000625
Full PDF
Citation
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
605

Share

Abstract

Objectives Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a rare genetic cause of stroke associated with connective tissue disorders but is not well known among stroke physicians.1 The main objectives of this case report are to increase awareness of this condition and to improve stroke prevention at follow-up visits.

Methods A patient with aortic and carotid artery dissection who had undergone 2 major aortic surgeries with mechanical composite graft and treated with full-dose anticoagulation was reevaluated by neurologists due to retinal hypoperfusion symptoms. After musculoskeletal examination, cervical ultrasonography, and computerized tomography angiography, he was referred for whole-genome sequencing.

Results We found joint hypermobility, skin hyperelasticity, bifid uvula, and combined cervical artery dissections that caused intermittently decreased blood flow in the left ophthalmic artery and an acute asymptomatic embolic stroke. A novel pathogenic variant of LDS type 5 consisting of a heterogeneous nonsense variant c.1044C>A, p.(Cys384*) was found in the TGF-β 3 (TGFB3) gene. Consequently, anticoagulation was intensified, and at 1-year follow-up, the patient's symptoms improved.

Discussion This novel genetic variant coupled to the patient's phenotype contributes to the knowledge of genetic causes of stroke. Patients with multiple arterial dissections and musculoskeletal features should be offered genetic testing and be carefully evaluated to avoid further cerebrovascular ischemic lesions.

Case Report

A 54-year-old man with a history of congenital hip luxation underwent acute surgery and supracoronary graft in the ascending aorta in 2018 due to a Stanford type A, Debakey type I aortic dissection. Follow-up CT angiography showed a rapid dilatation of the proximal descending aorta, from 37 to 57 mm (Figure, A).

Figure
Figure Vascular and Clinical Findings

CT angiography (CTA) showing aortic dissection membrane (black arrow, A). Coronal reconstruction of CTA showing right common carotid artery (CCA) dissection and left CCA occlusive dissection extending to the internal carotid artery (B). Passive apposition of the thumb to the flexor aspect of the forearm (C). Passive hyperextension of the elbow beyond 10° (D). Passive hyperextension of the knee beyond 10° (E). Postoperative umbilical hernia (F).

He was reoperated in 2019 with replacement of the aortic arch using a frozen elephant trunk technique followed by individual reimplantation of the cervical vessels and replacement of the aortic root with a mechanical composite graft and thereafter prescribed oral warfarin.

Postoperative follow-up computerized tomography angiography showed proximal right common carotid artery (CCA) dissection and an occluded left CCA (Figure, B). During several months, the patient experienced dizziness and monocular visual loss induced by head rotation to the left.

Carotid duplex ultrasound at our department confirmed patency of the right CCA (peak systolic velocity/end diastolic velocity = 142/15 cm/s) and right internal carotid artery (ICA, 75/17 cm/s). The left CCA was occluded, and the left ICA had a steal morphology (42/10 cm/s). Lower flow velocities in the left ophthalmic artery were detected with the patient's head turned to the left (28/10 cm/s vs 46/11 cm/s in neutral head position), indicating retinal artery hypoperfusion. Flow velocities in the right ophthalmic artery remained unchanged during head rotation (55/16 cm/s). Brain CT showed an asymptomatic small-sized acute ischemic infarct in the right superior frontal gyrus. Consequently, oral anticoagulation was adjusted to international normalized ratio (INR) target of 2.5–3.5 due to an initial INR of 2.1.

The patient informed us about previous joint dislocations. Physical examination showed skin hyperextensibility and joint hypermobility (Figure, C, D, and E), scoring 6 points on the Beighton scale score. Findings included pectus carinatum, bilateral pes cavus, bifid uvula, and unexpected postoperative umbilical hernia (Figure, F). In addition, one of his daughters had joint hypermobility. His mother had died suddenly at age 74 years of undetermined cardiovascular cause and had joint hypermobility. Whole-genome sequencing analyzing coding, splicing, and structural variants regarding 141 genes involved in connective tissue disorders2 identified a heterogeneous nonsense variant in the TGFB3 gene (NM_003239.4) c.1044C>A, p.(Cys384*), which is associated with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) type 5.

Discussion

LDS was first described in 2005 but remains relatively unknown. Since 2005, 5 major subtypes have been identified in relation to the gene mutations found in the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β receptor (types 1 and 2), TGFB 2 and 3 receptor ligands (types 4 and 5), or the small mothers against decapentaplegic homolog proteins 2 and 3, which are downstream transcription factors for cell growth, angiogenesis, apoptosis, and tumor inhibition (type 3).3 LDS type 5, caused by TGFB3 mutations situated in chromosome 14q24.3, is associated with aortic aneurysms and dissections involving the thoracic and/or abdominal aorta. Other features may include bifid uvula (links.lww.com/NXG/A475), cleft palate, mitral valve disease, skeletal overgrowth, cervical spine instability, and clubfoot deformity, although the phenotype varies largely between patients.3,-,5

The variant found in our patient, c.1044C>4, p.(Cys384*), located in a functional TGF domain, is novel and was found using whole-genome sequencing analyzing 141 genes causing connective tissue disorders. It has not been found, either in the normal population (gnomAD)6 or in patients. Other pathogenic sequence variants in the TGFB3 gene have been reported in children and adults and include missense substitutions (c.898C>G, p.(Arg300Gly), c.898C>T, p.(Arg300Trp) and c.899G>A, p.(Arg300Gln), c.1226G>A, p.(Cys409Tyr)), nonsense (p.Tyr365*), frameshift (c.704del, p.Asn235Metfs*11 and c.1102_1105del, p.(Leu368Thrfs*18)), and splice site (c.754+2T>C) variants. The patient's family members could potentially be mutation carriers and will be offered genetic counseling. A correlation with known mutations of this gene and the clinical features of our patient suggests that this variant is pathologic.

This case report emphasizes the vascular vulnerability of an aberrant TGFB signaling pathway. The multiple dissections predisposed our patient to retinal hypoperfusion. Acute ischemic infarcts have been reported in adults with LDS emphasizing the importance of thorough neuroradiology, ultrasonography, and thoracic radiology to prevent serious neurologic complications.7 At 1-year follow-up, our patient reported visual symptoms to occur more seldom and did not experience any dizziness recurrence. Cervical ultrasound showed an improvement of the left ICA dissection, which no longer exhibited any steal phenomenon, and flow velocities in the ophthalmic arteries were symmetrical. The patient did not report any new stroke symptoms or hemorrhagic complications with the higher INR target.

In conclusion, this report illustrates the need for early phenotype recognition of LDS, which may overlap with Ehlers-Danlos and Marfan syndromes, highlighting a potential underrecognized genetic cause of ischemic stroke.

Study Funding

No targeted funding reported.

Disclosure

The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/NG.

Appendix Authors

Table

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/NG for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

  • The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.

  • Received April 15, 2021.
  • Accepted in final form August 19, 2021.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Loeys BL,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Neptune ER, et al.
    A syndrome of altered cardiovascular, craniofacial, neurocognitive and skeletal development caused by mutations in TGFBR1 or TGFBR2. Nat Genet. 2005;37(3):275-281.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Stranneheim H,
    2. Lagerstedt-Robinson K,
    3. Magnusson M, et al.
    Integration of whole genome sequencing into a healthcare setting: high diagnostic rates across multiple clinical entities in 3219 rare disease patients. Genome Med. 2021;13:40.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Weiss A,
    2. Attisano L
    . The TGFbeta superfamily signaling pathway. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2013;2(1):47-63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bertoli-Avella AM,
    2. Gillis E,
    3. Morisaki H, et al.
    Mutations in a TGF-beta ligand, TGFB3, cause syndromic aortic aneurysms and dissections. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(13):1324-1336.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Loeys BL,
    2. Schwarze U,
    3. Holm T, et al.
    Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-beta receptor. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(8):788-798.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Karczewski KJ,
    2. Francioli LC,
    3. Tiao G, et al.
    The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581(7809):434-443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Laterza D,
    2. Ritelli M,
    3. Zini A, et al.
    Novel pathogenic TGFBR1 and SMAD3 variants identified after cerebrovascular events in adult patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2019;62(10):103727.
    OpenUrl

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
Advertisement

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

Alert Me

Recommended articles