Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Translations
    • Topics A-Z
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Translations
    • Topics A-Z
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues

User menu

  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology Genetics
Home
A peer-reviewed clinical and translational neurology open access journal
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues

Share

April 2021; 7 (2) ArticleOpen Access

Interactive Effects of HLA and GM Alleles on the Development of Alzheimer Disease

View ORCID ProfileJanardan P. Pandey, Paul J. Nietert, Ronald T. Kothera, Lisa L. Barnes, David A. Bennett
First published February 16, 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000000565
Janardan P. Pandey
From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology (J.P.P., R.T.K.) and Department of Public Health, Sciences (P.J.N.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center (L.L.B., D.A.B.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Janardan P. Pandey
Paul J. Nietert
From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology (J.P.P., R.T.K.) and Department of Public Health, Sciences (P.J.N.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center (L.L.B., D.A.B.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nieterpj@musc.edu
Ronald T. Kothera
From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology (J.P.P., R.T.K.) and Department of Public Health, Sciences (P.J.N.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center (L.L.B., D.A.B.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ron.kothera@gmail.com
Lisa L. Barnes
From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology (J.P.P., R.T.K.) and Department of Public Health, Sciences (P.J.N.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center (L.L.B., D.A.B.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lbarnes1@rush.edu
David A. Bennett
From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology (J.P.P., R.T.K.) and Department of Public Health, Sciences (P.J.N.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center (L.L.B., D.A.B.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david_a_bennett@rush.edu
Full PDF
Citation
Interactive Effects of HLA and GM Alleles on the Development of Alzheimer Disease
Janardan P. Pandey, Paul J. Nietert, Ronald T. Kothera, Lisa L. Barnes, David A. Bennett
Neurol Genet Apr 2021, 7 (2) e565; DOI: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000565

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
245

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective We investigated whether particular immunoglobulin GM (γ marker) alleles—individually or epistatically with a known human leukocyte antigen (HLA) risk allele—were associated with the development of Alzheimer disease (AD).

Methods Using a prospective cohort study design, we genotyped DNA samples from 209 African American (AA) and 638 European American (EA) participants for IgG1 (GM 3 and GM 17), IgG2 (GM 23+ and GM 23−), and HLA-DRB1 rs9271192 (A/C) alleles by TaqMan and rhAMP genotyping assays.

Results In EA subjects, none of the GM or HLA alleles—individually or epistatically—were associated with time to development of AD. In AA subjects, GM and HLA alleles individually were not associated with time to development of AD. However, there was a significant interaction: In the presence of GM 3 (i.e., GM 3/3 and GM 3/17 subjects), the presence of the HLA-C allele was associated with a 4-fold increase in the likelihood of developing AD compared with its absence (hazard ratio [HR] 4.17, 95% CI, 1.28–13.58). In the absence of GM 3 (GM 17/17 subjects), however, the presence of the HLA-C allele was not associated with time to development of AD (HR 1.10, 95% CI, 0.50–2.41).

Conclusions These results show that particular GM and HLA alleles epistatically contribute to the development of AD.

Glossary

AA=
African American;
AD=
Alzheimer disease;
EA=
European American;
GWAS=
Genome-wide association study;
HR=
hazard ratio;
IGHG=
immunoglobulin heavy chain G

Late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD) is a heritable, complex, and progressive brain disorder. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous risk genes, but most of the heritability of AD remains unexplained, suggesting additional genes in its etiology. Many risk-conferring genes identified thus far are enriched in the immune system pathways.1 A major gene of the immune system—HLA-DRB1—has been associated with AD by many studies, including the largest GWAS of AD to date.2 The C allele of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs9271192 within HLA-DRB1 seems to be a strong risk factor for AD.3

The current GWAS of AD do not evaluate a major gene complex of the immune system—GM (γ marker) allotypes encoded by immunoglobulin heavy chain G (IGHG) genes on chromosome 14.4,5 The 3 IGHG genes that encode GM allotypes are highly homologous and apparently not amenable to high throughput genotyping technology used in GWAS. Therefore, a candidate gene approach is necessary to investigate the role of the immunoglobulin GM allotypes in the immunobiology of AD. There is a good rationale for the GM gene involvement in the etiopathogenesis of AD. These genes have been shown to influence the magnitude of antibody responses to various antigens.4,5 The presence of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques is one of the hallmarks of AD. IgG heavy chains, where all GM allotypes are expressed, have inherent antiamyloidogenic activity.6 Thus, polymorphic GM genes could contribute to the interindividual differences in the level of antibody responses to Aβ, thereby influencing the pathogenesis of the disease.

In this study, we aimed to determine the individual and/or epistatic (defined as modification of the action of a gene by an allele at another locus) contribution of GM and HLA-DRB1 genotypes to the development of AD.

Methods

Study Design and Samples

Using a prospective cohort study design, this investigation used archived DNA specimens and data from 3 longitudinal cohorts on aging: The Minority Aging Research Study, The Rush Memory and Aging Project, and The Religious Orders Study, which have been described in detail elsewhere.7,8

A stratified sampling scheme was used to select a subset of participants without dementia at baseline from each cohort. African American (AA) participants from all 3 studies were included (n = 209). A subset of European American (EA) participants was randomly selected from the 2 cohorts that are predominantly EA (N = 638).

Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents

The study was approved by Institutional Review Boards of Rush University Medical Center and Medical University of South Carolina. All participants signed an informed consent and a repository consent to allow their data to be repurposed.

Data Availability

Data can be requested at radc.rush.edu.

GM Genotyping

IgG1 markers GM 3 and 17 (arginine to lysine) and IgG2 markers GM 23- and 23+ (valine to methionine) were determined by a TaqMan genotyping assay from Applied Biosystems Inc.

HLA-DRB1 rs9271192 Genotyping

HLA-DRB1 SNP rs9271192 (A > C) was determined by a custom-designed rhAMP SNP genotyping assay from Integrated DNA Technologies Inc.

Statistical Analysis

Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare rates of AD and mortality during follow-up between EAs and AAs, while adjusting for baseline age and length of follow-up time. Associations between the candidate genes and time to development of AD were assessed using Cox proportional hazards (PH) models, which accounted for mortality and loss to follow up. Models were developed separately for EAs and AAs, given that the allelic frequencies for GM and HLA vary considerably by race. Time to development of AD was modeled as a function of covariates (baseline age, sex, years of education, and APOE-4 carrier status), the candidate genes, and gene × gene interactions using a backwards model selection process. The covariates were forced into each model, regardless of statistical significance. For all models, the proportionality assumption was verified. No adjustment was made for multiple comparisons because this was largely a hypothesis generating exercise. Analyses were further stratified by sex to determine whether our findings were consistent for men and women. Analyses were conducted using SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Table presents the descriptive statistics of EA and AA subjects. The proportion of subjects that developed AD during the follow-up was higher in EA than that in the AA group (37.3 vs 19.6%), although this was not significant after adjusting for baseline age and length of follow-up time, which was higher among EAs than AAs (mean [SD]: 12.5 [4.6] vs 10.4 [3.1], p < 0.05). In addition, a higher proportion of EA than AA subjects died during the follow-up (61.4 vs 30.0%). For all genes of interest, there were markedly different genotype distributions noted when comparing EAs to AAs (p < 0.05 for all comparisons).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table

Descriptive Statistics of Cohorts Stratified by Race

In EA subjects, none of the GM or HLA alleles—individually or epistatically—were associated with time to development of AD (all p-values > 0.10). In AA subjects, however, a different pattern emerged. When no gene by gene interactions were considered, GM and HLA alleles individually were not associated with time to development of AD. However, when we included their interaction in the model, we identified a robust interaction. In the presence of GM 3 (i.e., GM 3/3 and GM 3/17 subjects), the presence of the HLA-C allele was associated with a 4-fold increase in the likelihood of developing AD compared with its absence (hazard ratio [HR] 4.17, 95% CI, 1.28–13.58, figure 1). In the absence of GM 3 (GM 17/17 subjects), however, the presence of the HLA-C allele was not associated with time to development of AD (HR 1.10, 95% CI, 0.50–2.41, figure 2). Because the APOE-4 allele and other variables were used as covariates in these analyses, the interactive effect of GM and HLA genotypes on the development of AD was independent of the APOE-4 allele status and other subject covariates.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 Proportion of African American Subjects Without Alzheimer Disease Over Time Among Subjects With the GM 3 Allele, Stratified by HLA C Status
Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2 Proportion of African American Subjects Without Alzheimer Disease Over Time Among Subjects Without the GM 3 Allele, Stratified by HLA C Status

.

Discussion

The results presented here clearly show that in AA, the C allele of the rs9271192 SNP within HLA-DRB1 may be a strong risk factor for AD in presence of the immunoglobulin GM 3 allele. This association was not found for EA. As mentioned earlier, several studies have reported the association of the C allele of the HLA-DRB1 SNP with susceptibility to AD. Because none of these studies genotyped for the GM gene complex, it is not possible to determine whether the HLA associations observed were independent of the GM genotype status of the subjects.

A possible mechanism of joint GM-HLA gene involvement in susceptibility to AD could be through their putative influence on antibody responses to Aβ via HLA-DRB1-restricted antigen processing/presentation pathway. IgG heavy chains (which express GM allotypes) have been shown to have natural antiamyloidogenic properties.6 It is possible that the antigen presenting B cells with the membrane-bound IgG expressing the GM 3 allotype are not effective recognition structures for the Aβ peptides. Furthermore, these peptides may not fit properly in the peptide-binding groove of the at-risk HLA-DRB1 C allele, leading to inadequate presentation to the CD4+ T helper cells and the consequent lack of B cell activation to generate anti-Aβ antibodies.

The reasons for the observed racial differences in the contribution of GM and HLA alleles in the development of AD are not clear. Both GM and HLA allele frequencies differ significantly between AA and EA populations. These differences, together with other racially associated genetic and nongenetic factors relevant to the development of AD, may have contributed to the differences observed in this investigation.

Although the phenomenon of epistasis has been known for over 100 years,9 there is a paucity of studies to detect possible epistatic interactions in human diseases.10 It is hoped that results presented here will inspire further investigations on gene-gene interactions in AD and other complex polygenic/multifactorial diseases.

Study Funding

This work was supported in part by the NIH (NIA grant Nos. AG058489, AG10161, AG17917, AG22018, and NCATS grant No. UL1-TR001450).

Disclosure

Disclosures available: Neurology.org/NG.

Appendix Authors

Table
Table

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/NG for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

  • The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.

  • Received July 15, 2020.
  • Accepted in final form December 22, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wang N,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Xu L,
    4. Jin S
    . Relationship between Alzheimer's disease and the immune system: a meta-analysis of differentially expressed genes. Front Neurosci 2019;12:1026.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Jansen IE,
    2. Savage JE,
    3. Watanabe K, et al
    . Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer's disease risk. Nat Genet 2019;51:404–413.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lu RC,
    2. Yang W,
    3. Tan L, et al
    . Association of HLA-DRB1 polymorphism with Alzheimer's disease: a replication and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017;8:93219–93226.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Oxelius VA,
    2. Pandey JP
    . Human immunoglobulin constant heavy G chain (IGHG) (Fcγ) (GM) genes, defining innate variants of IgG molecules and B cells, have impact on disease and therapy. Clin Immunol 2013;149:475–486.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Warrender AK,
    2. Kelton W
    . Beyond allotypes: the influence of allelic diversity in antibody constant domains. Front Immunol 2020;11:2016.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Adekar SP,
    2. Klyubin I,
    3. Macy S, et al
    . Inherent anti-amyloidogenic activity of human immunoglobulin gamma heavy chains. J Biol Chem 2010;285:1066–1074.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Barnes LL,
    2. Shah RC,
    3. Aggarwal NT,
    4. Bennett DA,
    5. Schneider JA
    . The Minority Aging Research Study: ongoing efforts to obtain brain donation in African Americans without dementia. Curr Alzheimer’s Res 2012;9:734–745.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bennett DA,
    2. Buchman AS,
    3. Boyle PA,
    4. Barnes LL,
    5. Wilson RS,
    6. Schneider JA
    . Religious orders study and rush memory and aging Project. J Alzheimer’s Dis 2018;64:S161–S189.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bateson W
    . Mendel's Principles of Heredity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1909.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Felsky D,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Chibnik LB, et al
    . Genetic epistasis regulates amyloid deposition in resilient aging. Alzheimers Dement 2017;13:1107–1116.
    OpenUrl

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Glossary
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Study Funding
    • Disclosure
    • Appendix Authors
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • All Genetics
  • All Immunology
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Association studies in genetics
  • Risk factors in epidemiology

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Advertisement
Neurology Genetics: 8 (5)

Articles

  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Popular Articles

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Neurology: Education
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology: Genetics | Online ISSN: 2376-7839

© 2022 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise