Abstract
Objective To expand the clinical phenotype of the X-linked HNRNPH2-related neurodevelopmental disorder in 33 individuals.
Methods Participants were diagnosed with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in HNRNPH2 using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association of Molecular Pathology criteria, largely identified via clinical exome sequencing. Genetic reports were reviewed. Clinical data were collected by retrospective chart review and caregiver report including standardized parent report measures.
Results We expand our clinical characterization of HNRNPH2-related disorders to include 33 individuals, aged 2–38 years, both females and males, with 11 different de novo missense variants, most within the nuclear localization signal. The major features of the phenotype include developmental delay/intellectual disability, severe language impairment, motor problems, growth, and musculoskeletal disturbances. Minor features include dysmorphic features, epilepsy, neuropsychiatric diagnoses such as autism spectrum disorder, and cortical visual impairment. Although rare, we report early stroke and premature death with this condition.
Conclusions The spectrum of X-linked HNRNPH2-related disorders continues to expand as the allelic spectrum and identification of affected males increases.
Glossary
- ABC=
- Adaptive Behavior Composite;
- ADHD=
- attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder;
- ASD=
- autism spectrum disorder;
- BASC-3=
- Behavior Assessment System for Children, third edition;
- NDD=
- neurodevelopmental disorder;
- NLS=
- nuclear localization sequence;
- OFC=
- occipital frontal circumference;
- PC=
- principal component;
- PCA=
- PC analysis;
- PDD=
- pervasive developmental disorder;
- PEDI-CAT=
- Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test;
- RBP=
- RNA-binding protein;
- SCQ=
- Social Communication Questionnaire;
- SP2=
- Sensory Profile 2;
- SRS=
- Social Responsiveness Scale;
- SSP2=
- Short SP2;
- VABS-III=
- Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, third edition
Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are a complex, heterogeneous group of disorders with shared phenomenology associated with significant lifelong burdens. Up to 30% of these conditions currently have an identifiable genetic basis.1,–,3 X-linked genes are a frequent cause of NDDs, including intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder (ASD).4,–,7 One X-linked gene, HNRNPH2, encodes the hnRNP H2 protein, a member of the heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein family.8,9 We previously described 3 missense variants in the nuclear localization sequence (NLS) in HNRNPH2 in 6 unrelated females with a common neurodevelopmental phenotype including developmental delay/intellectual disability, ASD, tone abnormalities, and seizures (OMIM 300986, Mental retardation, X-linked, syndromic, Bain type).10 Since our initial report, there have been additional reports of males with variants in HNRNPH2 and another family with presumed germline mosaicism with 2 affected siblings.7,11,12 Herein, we describe an expanded genotypic and phenotypic spectrum of individuals with variants in the X-linked HNRNPH2 gene. We hypothesize that those individuals who carry a pathogenic variant located within the NLS are more severely affected than those with variants outside the NLS.
Methods
Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents
Participants were referred to this study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03492060) if they were diagnosed with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in HNRNPH2 using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association of Molecular Pathology criteria, largely identified via clinical exome sequencing. The study was approved by the Columbia University Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all caregivers or legal guardians.
Retrospective Chart Review
Genetic reports were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis. Information was provided by the primary caregiver by phone interview and online questionnaires and verified with clinician report when available. Cognitive, behavioral, and other psychological testing was collected on participants or clinical providers when available. Photographs were collected from families and taken during family conferences. Brain MRI reports were reviewed, and when available, images were reviewed by a board-certified pediatric neuroradiologist. A heuristic clinical severity score was developed based on the most common phenotypic variables such as presence of ASD, anxiety, vision problems, seizures, and tone anomalies. We performed a principal component analysis (PCA) of participants using the same set of clinical features. Missing values were imputed using the mean value of the corresponding clinical feature in the cohort. The PCA was conducted using an R package “pcaMethods.”
Prospective Data Collection
Once enrolled in the natural history study, parents and caregivers provided responses about the individuals' medical history from birth to present. Of note, some participants, based on their older age, may have previously been diagnosed using earlier version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition, and for accuracy purpose, we report the diagnosis that was given at that time to the parents, such as pervasive developmental disorder (PDD)-not otherwise specified. Parents and caregivers also completed standardized measures of functioning using various online platforms. Adaptive functioning was measured using the online Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, third edition (VABS-III).13,14 Vineland normed scores were standardized with a mean of 100 and an SD of 15. Social communication skills were measured by completion of the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ)15 and Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), Second Edition.16 Sensory processing was evaluated to assess the participants' ability to create a balance between high and low threshold stimuli, using the Sensory Profile 2 (SP2).17 The Short SP2 (SSP2) is a valid standardized parent report measure that defines and illustrates responses to sensory stimuli.17,–,19 The measure is organized using a 5-point Likert scale with possible responses ranging from “never” to “always.” Interpretation of scores is based on normative data.17,18 Six sensory domains of the SP2 were performed: auditory processing, visual processing, touch processing, movement processing, oral processing, and behavioral and then calculated into the 4 quadrants Avoiding, Seeking, Sensitivity, and Registration.17,18 The SSP2 scoring scale is segmented into lower and high levels comprised of “much less than others (more than 2 SD below the mean), “less than others” (1–2 SD below the mean), “just like the majority of others” (±1 SD from the mean), “more than others” (between 1 SD and 2 SD above the mean), and “much more than others” (2+ SD above the mean).17,18,20 Behavioral and emotional concerns were measured using the Behavior Assessment System for Children, third edition (BASC-3), for ages 2 through 22 years.21 The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) is designed for use with children and youth (birth through 20 years of age) with a variety of physical and/or behavioral conditions and measures functions across 4 domains (i.e., daily activities, mobility, social-cognitive, and responsibility).22
Data Availability
Anonymized data will be shared by request from any qualified investigator. For those participants who have consented to research with Simons Searchlight, data are available through SFARIbase (base.sfari.org/).
Results
We describe 33 participants with 11 different de novo missense variants in HNRNPH2, including 2 recurrent variants p.R206W (n = 18) and p.R206G (n = 5) (figure 1, table 1). All variants are predicted pathogenic based on at least 2 algorithms, and none of the variants are observed in Genome Aggregation Database (figure 1).
Regions of HNRNPH2 gene with plot of all the variants (A) and predicted pathogenicity and allele frequencies of HNRNPH2 variants (B).
Clinical Phenotypes of Individuals With HNRNPH2 Variants
Probands ranged from age 2–38 years and included 29 females and 4 males (average 15 years, median 11 years). One participant died in her sleep at age 23 years. Of note, her genetic diagnosis was returned postmortem, and an autopsy was not performed. The summary below is the medical history reported for 32 individuals in the natural history study with 1 lost to follow up (table e-2, links.lww.com/NXG/A362).
Prenatal and Birth Complications
All participants were conceived naturally, to mothers ranging from 19 to 39 years of age and fathers ranging from 18 to 42 years old. Aside from 1 fraternal twin birth, all others were singleton births. Four parents reported intrauterine growth restriction, and 24% of mothers recalled having decreased fetal movements or periods of stillness. All were born full term, although 39% were induced. Five required intensive care admission, ranging from 3 hours to 6 days. One participant (#24) briefly required ventilator support, but most others had normal Apgar scores. All 5 participants who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit had subsequent brain imaging. One had delayed myelination, but all others did not reveal any concern for hypoxic-ischemic, anoxic, or white matter abnormalities suggestive of fetal or neonatal distress. No birth defects were noted, although common facial features are seen (figure 2).
Participant 1 at 5 years (A), participant 2 at 4 years (B), participant 3 at 17 years (C), participant 4 at 21 years (D), participant 5 at 10 years (E), participant 6 at 37 years (F), participant 7 at 11 years (G), participant 8 at 5 years (H), participant 9 at 3 years (I), participant 10 at 3 years (J), participant 11 at 4 years (K), participant 12 at 7 years (L), participant 13 at 13 years (M), participant 14 at 18 years (N), participant 15 at 2 years (O), participant 17 at 8 years (P), participant 18 at 16 years (Q), participant 19 at 23 years (R), participant 20 at 4 years (S), participant 21 at 6 years (T), participant 22 at 19 years (U), and participant 23 at 9 years (V). (W.a) Dorsal view of thumb hypoplasia in participant 5 at 3 years. (W.b) Palmar view of thumb hypoplasia in participant 20 at 5 years. (W.c) Dorsal view of arachnodactyly in participant 16 at 17 years. (W.d) Curvature of the fifth finger toward the adjacent fourth finger (clinodactyly) in participant 11 at 12 years. (X.a) Frontal view; sandal gap left hallux; right foot clubbing in participant 5 at 2 years. (X.b) Bilateral brachydactyly in participant 29 at 3 years. (X.c) Medial view of calcaneal adduction with navicular bone drop in participant 9 at 18 years. (X.d) Frontal view of sandal gap (right) with varus deviation in participant 17 at 21 years.
The average birth weight was 3.32 kg (range 2.34–5.97 kg, SD = 0.70). The average birth length was 50.5 cm (range 45.7–54.6 cm, SD = 2.3). The average occipital frontal circumference (OFC) was normocephalic at 33.7 cm (range 33–35 cm, SD = 1.07), although birth OFC was not available for most participants.
Most mothers reported difficulties with feeding (67%), and half of probands had difficulty gaining weight (55%) as infants. Although 3 parents reported initial concerns immediately after birth, most parents reported concerns about their child's development before age 12 months. All probands have developmental delay or intellectual disability (table e-2, links.lww.com/NXG/A362). Six caregivers report regression or loss of skills during an intercurrent illness, which were regained afterward. Most individuals are nonverbal or minimally verbal (76%). Those who acquired speech did so between 1 and 5 years of age. In addition, most report speech articulation difficulties or speech or oral motor apraxia.
Neurologic Issues
More than half of the participants had EEG or magnetoencephalography. Abnormal EEG monitoring included paroxysmal activity in the right temporal lobe and left posterior and midline epileptiform discharges as well as diffuse background slowing. Nearly half of the cohort had a clinical seizure (42%), and 3 more reported an abnormal EEG without clinical seizures (10%). Clinical seizure semiologies were varied, including febrile (23%), staring (69%), tonic (38%), tonic-clonic (43%), spasms (23%), myoclonic (15%), and clonic (15%). One participant had a generalized tonic-clonic seizure at age 6 years after head injury but did not have any further episodes and did not take any antiepileptic medication. The average age of first seizure was 8.7 years. Of the participants who reported seizures, 9 (64%) participants had taken a seizure medication, but many stopped taking the medication due to being ineffective (15%), side effects (23%), or cessation of seizures (15%). Participants currently on levetiracetam and valproic acid report good seizure control (table 1). One participant had a first-time seizure (tonic-absence) at age 34 years. The same participant had a stroke 3 weeks following the seizure.
OFCs were obtained from those available, and 30% have microcephaly (defined as more than 2 SDs below the mean OFC), mostly acquired microcephaly. Other neurologic diagnoses include hypotonia (97%), difficulty with coordination (70%), balance (70%), gait (48%), whole-body apraxia (motor planning difficulties) (52%), muscle rigidity/spasticity (33%), tics (15%), dizziness (12%), tremor (9%), headaches (9%), dystonia (6%), and akathisia (3%). Weakness is reported in 24%, while 15% of individuals have been given the diagnosis of cerebral palsy by clinical providers. Ninety-four and 90% either currently or previously have received physical therapy and occupational therapy, respectively.
Sleep
Six participants (18%) reported severe sleep disturbance associated with difficulty falling and staying asleep. Of the participants who reported sleep disturbance, half reported melatonin as an effective remedy.
Sensory issues are reported in many, including both hypo- and hyper-sensitivity to pain, temperature, and touch. Sensory processing issues were stratified using the SSP2, which was completed by caregivers of 11 female participants, including 2 toddlers, 5 children, 1 adolescent, and 3 adults, aged 2–39 years (figure 4, A–C) Of the 1 toddlers who were evaluated, both exhibited distinctive diminished sensory processing with more than 2 SDs above the mean in the domains of visual processing and auditory processing. They also both showed increased sensory processing in areas of general processing and oral sensory processing, scores at least 1 SD above the mean. For the children who had SSP2 completed, all except 1 participant with an ASD diagnosis were found to have distinct diminished sensory processing in the area of body positioning, each of which was more than 2 SDs above the mean. Disturbances in modulation were also noted in movement processing, all except 1 participant with an ASD diagnosis exhibited 1–2+ SD above the mean. The majority of the child cohort presented with typical modulation of sensory input affecting emotional responses, within 1 SD above the mean. Within the adult cohort evaluated, 2 participants exhibited distinct diminished sensory processing in touch processing and body movement processing, scoring at least 2 SD above the mean. The third participant in the adult cohort responded to multiple questions in the same areas, with “almost always.”
Most individuals have had brain imaging, most commonly MRI, and general findings include vertical configuration of the splenium of the corpus callosum, delayed myelination, and decreased cerebellar volume (figure 3, table e-2, links.lww.com/NXG/A362). In addition, 1 male participant (#1) had restricted diffusion of the tegmental tracts at age 10 months (figure 3, E and F). Two participants had MR spectroscopy, one was normal and the other showed lactate peaks in the bilateral basal ganglia.
Sagittal T1-weighted image demonstrates a vertical configuration of the posterior body/splenium of the corpus callosum (A and C, arrows) as well as thinning of the corpus callosum (C) (participant 27). Coronal T2-weighted image demonstrates prominence of the extra-axial spaces (arrows) in this child age 1 year 5 months (B) (participant 14). Axial T2-weighted image demonstrates delayed myelination of the anterior limbs of the internal capsule (arrow) in this patient age 10.5 months (D) (participant 1). Axial diffusion-weighted (E) and apparent diffusion coefficient (F) images demonstrate restricted diffusion involving the tegmental tracts (arrows, participant 1).
(A) Radar plot depicting sensory processing domains of Toddler Sensory Profile 2, where scores of 1 represent much less than others, 2 represents less than others, 3 represents just like the majority of others, 4 represents more than others, and 5 represents much more than others (n = 2). (B) Radar plot depicting sensory processing domains of Child Sensory Profile 2, where scores of 1 represent much less than others, 2 represents less than others, 3 represents just like the majority of others, 4 represents more than others, and 5 represents much more than others. Dotted lines represent participants with a parent reported ASD diagnosis (n = 7). (C) Radar plot depicting sensory processing quadrants for all Toddler, Child and Adolescent Sensory Profile 2, where scores of 1 represent much less than others, 2 represents less than others, 3 represents just like the majority of others, 4 represents more than others, and 5 represents much more than others. Dotted lines represent participants with an ASD diagnosis (n = 10). (D) Domain scores behavioral and emotional concerns were measured using the Behavior Assessment System for Children, third edition. ASD = autism spectrum disorder.
Five participants had muscle biopsies during their diagnostic evaluation for hypotonia and global developmental delay. Muscle biopsies were mixed, with 3 normal results (table e-2, links.lww.com/NXG/A362) and 2 abnormal. One result showed mild type II fiber atrophy by muscle enzyme histochemistry with mild increase in morphologically normal glycogen and mitochondria (participant 8 at age 10 months), and another showed reduced activity complex II and III of the respiratory chain enzymes (participant 30 at age 1 month). One participant had an EMG/nerve conduction study with normal amplitude, distal latency, and conduction velocity of the peroneal nerve. Needle EMG of selected muscles showed evidence of chronic denervation with decreased recruitment of high amplitude long duration motor units in the extensor digitorum breves and abductor hallucis muscles with normal gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior (#18).
Psychiatric Diagnoses and Concerns
Caregivers reported a high frequency of psychiatric or other behavioral concerns, and these were often corroborated by formal testing (table e-1, links.lww.com/NXG/A361). Diagnoses in this group include ASD (34%), PDD (17%), (atypical) Rett syndrome (10%), social communication disorder (3%), and childhood disintegrative disorder (3%), with a total of 47% overall with one of these diagnoses. Although parent report revealed just under half with an ASD clinical diagnosis (inclusive of PDD in older individuals), most individuals had elevated scores suggestive of ASD on both the SCQ and the SRS (figure 5, A and B). Many individuals reported clinically notable elevated scores for externalizing, internalizing, and overall behavioral symptoms with lower adaptive skillset (figure 4D). Only 15% had a clinical diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but many caregivers reported concerns with attention (33%), distractibility (24%), and hyperactivity (14%). Many report anxiety (67%), self-injurious behaviors (38%), panic attacks (10%), depression (5%), and hallucinations (5%). Twenty-three percent of participants have taken psychiatric medications, including antipsychotics, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, psychostimulants, beta blockers, benzodiazepines, alpha-2-agonists, and opioid antagonists (table 1).
(A) Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) with elevated scores more than 15 suggestive of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis. (B) Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) with elevated T scores more than 60 suggestive of ASD diagnosis. (C) Standard scores for 19 affected individuals are shown for the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, third edition (VABS-III), Parent or Caregiver form. Scores include the overall Adaptive Behavior Composite (ABC) Score as well as individual scores for each domain (communication, daily living skills, socialization, and motor skills). The motor skills domain is only calculated for individuals aged 9 years or younger (n = 8). Scores are norm-referenced to individual of the same age, with normed scores standardized with a mean of 100 and a SD of 15. The horizontal line at 70 represents 2 SDs below the mean.
Gastrointestinal Issues
Feeding and gastrointestinal issues are present in nearly all participants: any feeding concern (97%), chronic constipation (60%), poor appetite (34%), difficulty with swallowing (34%), gastroesophageal reflux (28%), diarrhea (9%), pica (9%), overeating (6%), chronic abdominal bloating (3%), and severe abdominal pain (3%). Four participants use a gastrostomy tube for feeding (13%).
Endocrine, Growth Issues
Approximately half of caregivers report significant weight abnormalities (47%) and history of failure to thrive (36%). Twelve gained weight too slowly, whereas 2 gained too much weight. Six were short for age (19%). One had precocious puberty (3%) and 3 with delayed sexual development (9%).
Orthopedic Issues
Seventy-five percent have an orthopedic issue, including scoliosis (33%), hip dysplasia (21%), kyphosis (4%), lordosis (4%), arthritis (4%), and missing spinous process (5%). Common surgeries include scoliosis, hip dysplasia or dislocated hips, or ankle/foot repairs.
Of the 24 participants with a reported orthopedic issue, 29% report muscle, bone, or joint pain, whereas 13% had stiffness. Half of individuals wear supportive braces (50%), including ankle foot orthotics (44%), orthotic inserts (19%), supramalleolar orthotics (13%), and dynamic ankle orthotics (13%). Most children and adults were noted to have similar extremity deformities such as pes planus, calcaneal adduction with navicular bone drop, with finger arachnodactyly (figure 2).
Vision
Many children (73%) have visual defects. Of these, 54% report strabismus. Other findings include cortical visual impairment (33%), poor vision (13%), myopia (17%), and congenital ptosis (4%).
Hearing
About one-fourth of individuals report hearing deficits (28%), including recurrent infections (22%) and tinnitus (11%).
Cardiovascular Issue
Two individuals had mitral valve prolapse (6%), 1 individual had aortic dilation (3%), and 1 participant had atrial septal defect (3%).
Pulmonary Issues
Three participants reported occasional hyperventilation associated with breath-holding, one with silent aspiration, and another with reactive airway disease.
A heuristic severity score was developed by applying a weighted sum of common symptoms within the cohort, including developmental delay/intellectual disability, developmental regression, microcephaly, cortical vision impairment, tone problems, seizures, movement disorder, growth problems, and other neuropsychiatric diagnoses such as ASD, anxiety, and ADHD.
PCA shows that principal component (PC) 1 is highly correlated with the heuristic severity scores with Pearson correlation coefficient of −0.72. The top contributing features for PC1 and contributing to severity include ASD, PDD, social communication disorder, childhood disintegrative disorder, Rett syndrome, anxiety, and regression. PC2 is attributed mostly to sex and sex-differentiated features. Boys in this cohort are more likely to have cortical visual impairment and abnormal brain MRI, and more girls experienced anxiety. PC3 distinguishes age of the participants. Older children were diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder more often. Younger children often had sleep problems, developmental regression, or microcephaly. The first 3 PCs explain 17.8%, 14.7%, and 11.4%, respectively, of the variance in the data.
A subset of caregivers (n = 19) provided information about their child's adaptive daily living functioning using the VABS-III (figure 5C). Scores include the overall Adaptive Behavior Composite (ABC) Score as well as individual scores for each domain (communication, daily living skills, socialization, and motor skills). All individuals had relatively higher scores for socialization compared with other domains, although the overall values were low to below average. Most individuals were grossly delayed across all domains, which was reflected in the overall composite score (ABC score). The motor skills domain, which is only calculated for individuals aged 9 years or younger (n = 8), also showed gross delays. Few participants had higher scores in some domains and among these outliers were individuals with the genotypes p.R212G (n = 1) and p.P213L (n = 1).
Discussion
Variants in the X-linked gene HNRNPH2 cause a neurodevelopmental syndrome with an expanding phenotype with the identification of additional variants and a small number of males.10,–,12,23 Here, we describe the largest descriptive study of 33 individuals, with 11 different de novo missense variants in HNRNPH2, most located within or adjacent to the NLS. The 2 recurrent missense variants, p.R206W (n = 18) and p.R206Q (n = 5), remain the most common missense variants. There are 2 additional missense variants at this same amino acid residue (p.R206G and p.R206L), suggesting that this amino acid is functionally important. Furthermore, there are other nearby missense variants at amino acids 209, 210, 212, and 213, all within or adjacent the NLS (figure 1) supporting an earlier hypothesis that the NLS is critical for gene function. Two additional predicted pathogenic de novo variants were also identified farther away from this region at residues 114 and 340.
This study also includes 4 males whose average heuristic severity score is elevated (more severe) than females. Moreover, the 2 males harboring variants within the NLS appear to have a much more severe phenotype than the 2 outside the NLS. These findings along with previously reported males with HNRNPH2-related disorder refute the previous hypothesis that variants in males are always embryonic lethal.
The major features of the HNRNPH2-related disorder phenotype include developmental delay/intellectual disability, severe language impairment, motor problems, growth, and musculoskeletal disturbances. Minor features include dysmorphic features, epilepsy, neuropsychiatric diagnoses such as ASD, and cortical visual impairment. A third of the cohort reports short-term regression in times of illness or after clinical seizures, followed by regaining previously acquired skills in most individuals. Importantly, microcephaly is reported in about half of the individuals, mostly acquired, but there is no association between microcephaly and developmental regression or seizures. The most severely affected individuals have severe intellectual disability, are nonambulatory, and nonverbal. The least affected individual in this group is a 17-year-old girl with the p.R212T variant with developmental delay and ASD who is verbal, ambulatory, and in secondary education. Based on this larger study, the clinical course appears to be static and not progressive or degenerative through early adulthood. Although rare, we report early stroke and premature death with this condition, although it is unclear whether these are comorbid conditions or whether HNRNPH2-related disorder is causative of these neurologic outcomes.
Although most participants were born without any specific findings, caregivers had early concerns usually before 12 months of age, such as poor feeding with failure to thrive in infancy. There are no associated congenital anomalies, but distinct physical features are often seen including almond-shaped eyes, short palpebral fissures, a short philtrum, full lower lip and micrognathia with associated extremity findings such as arachnodactyly, curled toes, pes planus, calcaneal adduction, and navicular bone drop.
Most individuals with HNRNPH2-related disorder have low cognitive profiles. We sought to better understand the adaptive functioning of this group, as they may also better reflect the overall functioning of individuals compared with cognitive measures, given challenges with the administration and interpretation of standardized cognitive tests in severely disabled individuals, anxiety, and avoidance affecting test performances. Overall skillsets were low across several measures of adaptive functioning (VABS-III, BASC-3, and PEDI-CAT). Communication is severely affected, as 76% of individuals are nonverbal or minimally verbal, and others have apraxia of speech or articulation difficulties. Psychiatric comorbidities are also high in this group, notably anxiety, ADHD, and self-injurious behaviors.
The motor system is particularly involved in HNRNPH2-related disorders, with early motor concerns in both fine and gross motor skills. Tone abnormalities are common, with weakness and decreased muscle bulk with nonspecific muscle biopsy findings (table e-1, links.lww.com/NXG/A361) and 1 participant with EMG finding of selective lower extremity denervation. Orthopedic and musculoskeletal issues are common in this group, and many have required surgical procedures of the hips and feet. Sensory issues are commonly reported across the lifespan present with elevated modulation disturbances in touch, body movement, auditory, visual, and oral sensory processing. These sensory issues were markedly exaggerated in all 4 quadrants in children with ASD compared with those without ASD diagnosis, similar to other ASD cohorts.20 Of interest, individuals in this group also shared similar findings to children with cerebral palsy with sensory processing deficits on body positioning and movement that impede their motor system.24 More detailed phenotyping of these sensory anomalies will be important to describe and quantify as these appear to be significant impact on daily activities.
Seizures have been reported as early as 3 years and as late as 34 years of age; however, 23% had reported seizures in the setting of a fever so it is unclear whether some of these are benign febrile seizures. The oldest participant had the seizure preceding a stroke. Altogether, 60% of participants have either clinical seizures or seizure activity on EEG. There is no specific seizure type, and different medications have been used, with both levetiracetam and valproic acid reported as effective.
All participants share a common developmental phenotype with developmental delays, neuropsychiatric diagnoses, and low adaptive function across all domains. Although there does not appear to be a strict genotype-phenotype correlation, this is limited by the distribution of cases across genotypes, with the majority of individuals with p.R206W and p.R206Q. There is heterogeneity even within the 2 most common genotypes, perhaps due to differences in X inactivation. However, boys are generally more severely affected than girls. HNRNPH2 amino acids between 194 and 220, including the highly conserved region at 205–210, are responsible for the nuclear import activity of the GYR domain, and even variants outside this region are also associated with disease and pathogenic.25,–,27 Our cohort with 31 of 33 individuals carrying pathogenic variants between residues 205 and 213 suggests that this is a critical region for protein function. We continue to propose a change in function mechanism in the pathogenesis of HNRNPH2-related disorder, possibly through mis-localization of the protein due to the disruption of the NLS and other non-NLS residues; however, there does not appear to be any toxic accumulation with several unrevealing muscle biopsies in this study.
Importantly, HNRNPH1 is a highly conserved autosomal paralogue of HNRNPH2 with over 95% sequence homology. Heterozygous missense variants in HNRNPH1 are associated with an overlapping clinical phenotype with HNRNPH2-related disorder, and these variations occur at residue 206 in HNRNPH1, further suggesting the importance of this region.28,29 Assuming that HNRNPH1 is fully functional in individuals with HNRNPH2-related disorder and that these 2 proteins function similarly, functional HNRNPH1 may be able to partially compensate for disrupted HNRNPH2. Assessing the functional consequences of each these de novo variants will be important to better understand the pathophysiology and identify possible therapeutic interventions for these disorders.
Although RNA splicing factors including hnRNPs A1, A2, A1/B2, H, K, and M have been implicated in various cancers, other RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are increasingly implicated in neurologic disorders.25,26,30,31 Various mechanisms of altered RNA homeostasis are implicated in neurologic disorders such as spinal muscular atrophy, ALS, ASD, and other neurodegenerative disorders with altered RBP expression, RBP aggregation, and RNA-mediated toxicity.31 Specifically, HNRNP genes are an emerging class of genes associated with neurologic disorders including limb-girdle muscular dystrophy associated with HNRNPHDL,7,32 HNRNPR-related NDD,33 and epileptic encephalopathies associated with HNRNPU loss-of-function variants.34 This study broadens the clinical spectrum of HNRNPH2-related disorder and may provide insight to a newly emerging group of NDDs associated with the group of RBPs called hnRNPs.
Study Funding
Grant support for L. Boyle provided by TL1TR001875.
Disclosure
The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/NG for full disclosures.
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge all the families from the Yellow Brick Road Project who support this Natural History Study and data provided by Simons Searchlight and SFARI support.
Appendix Authors
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/NG for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.
The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.
- Received July 6, 2020.
- Accepted in final form October 30, 2020.
- Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
References
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.