Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Translations
    • Topics A-Z
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Translations
    • Topics A-Z
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues

User menu

  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology Genetics
Home
A peer-reviewed clinical and translational neurology open access journal
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues

Share

August 2020; 6 (4) EditorialOpen Access

What does a defect in N-glycosylation mean for neuronal migration and function?

Alica M. Goldman
First published July 7, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000000490
Alica M. Goldman
From the Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
What does a defect in N-glycosylation mean for neuronal migration and function?
Alica M. Goldman
Neurol Genet Aug 2020, 6 (4) e490; DOI: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000490

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
329

Share

  • Article
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Patients with epilepsy have not benefitted equally from the availability of next-generation sequencing. Although the diagnostic yield in epileptic encephalopathies is up to 50%, it is only approximately 12% in non-acquired focal epilepsies (NAFE).1 However, somatic mosaicism has emerged as an important cause of genetic causation in NAFE. This is hardly surprising, considering the scale of cellular divisions and differentiations during the human brain development that provides ample opportunities for the occurrence of brain-restricted somatic variation. For example, depending on the developmental timing and a progenitor lineage, pathogenic variants leading to mammalian target of rapamycin pathway activation result in a spectrum of brain malformations, such as focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) type 2 or hemimegalencephaly.2,3 Of interest, these developmental lesions seem to display a mutant allele gradient and a dose effect; approximately 13% of mutant alleles were observed in FCD type 2 compared with 40% in hemimegalencephaly, and the highest variant allele fraction seems to be in the epicenter of a lesion.3,4 Although research has elucidated mechanisms underlying some malformations of cortical development, molecular etiology of other FCD types has remained obscured. N-glycosylation defects linked to pathogenic variants in the Solute Carrier Family 35 Member A2 gene (SLC35A2) have emerged as causal to an X-linked early onset epileptic encephalopathy typically manifested with infantile spasms or West syndrome in women or in mosaic men and most recently, they were also identified in approximately 30% of NAFE because of FCD type 1.5,6 SLC35A2 encodes a uridine diphosphate galactose transporter (UGT). A defect in the UGT results in a reduced galactosylation of N-glycosylated proteins, glycosphingolipids, and proteoglycans, which affects neuronal migration, axon guidance, and synaptic physiology.7 In this issue of Neurology® Genetics, Miller et al.,8 attempted to explore the impact of SLC35A2 gene insufficiency on neuronal excitability. Evaluation of a 3-year-old boy with West syndrome and generalized spasms showed that the ictal electrographic correlates demonstrated a consistent emphasis over the left posterior head quadrant, a region further implicated by a subtle signal abnormality on brain MRI and a hypometabolism on a fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Invasive monitoring with subdural grids and strips showed a varied density of interictal activity in the sampled areas and a broad ictal involvement of all subdural contacts. The patient underwent a multilobar resection, a neuropathologic examination confirmed FCD type 1c,2 and exome sequencing identified a somatic, brain tissue-restricted, previously reported pathogenic variant in the SLC35A2 gene (NM_005660.3:c.634-635delTC, p.Ser212LeufsTer9). The variant allele ranged from 0.6% to 27.7% in an exome and from 4.2% to 19.5% in a targeted variant validation across resected regions. The authors observed a correlation between interictal spike density and the pathogenic allele burden. The highest variant fraction (19.5%) and interictal spike density (32 spikes per minute) were in the hippocampal tissue, whereas the area of the inferior occipital gyrus showed the lowest spike frequency (5.7 spikes per minute) and a lesser variant allele proportion (4.2%–6.5%). This gene identification and validation study underscores the value for genetic diagnostic profiling of a resected brain tissue in patients with a nondiagnostic genetic testing of their peripheral samples. It adds to the growing number of cases where focal, genetically predisposed abnormalities manifest in generalized spasms. This lends some explanation for the surprisingly low (15%) yield of genetic testing of a peripheral DNA in this patient population.9 A report by Miller et al.8 further validates the SLC35A2 gene as causal in FCD type 1 and lends support to experimental data linking disordered N-glycosylation to FCD type 1 and neuronal hyperexcitability and seizures.10 It also attempts to link clinical markers of neuronal hyperexcitability to the burden of SLC35A2 variation. However, many questions remain; first, there is the currently unresolved relationship between a mutant variant load and the resulting phenotype. In a recent case series, Vals et al. failed to see a correlation between the phenotype severity and the estimated quantity of pathogenic SLC35A2 variants.5 Of interest in the current study, variant proportions did not correlate with the messenger RNA expression of the alternative allele, suggesting the possibility of a nonsense-mediated decay. Because the UGT protein was not assessed, relationship among the varied proportions of the alternative allele to UGT quantities or function remain unclear. In addition, the imaging suggested an extensive area of signal abnormality and one would assume a corresponding structural distortion of cortical architecture. Curiously, the interictal spiking was restricted to a few defined areas within much larger regions sampled in this study. Future experimental work will have to clarify the potential impact of different SLC35A2 pathogenic variants on neuronal structure and cellular and network function. The reported correlation among the spike frequency and the SLC35A2 pathogenic variant proportions is interesting but will need to be confirmed in a sufficiently large case series with well-defined ictal onset and extended sampling of ictal and interictal data. Future studies will also need to pay attention to the properties and densities of spikes and variants at the margins of the resected lesion and explain their relevance for the outcome. Although it is tempting to ponder the reported relationship among the pathogenic SLC35A2 variant proportions and the severity of imaging abnormalities, the absence of an unbiased quantification of the visualized lesion makes this correlation problematic to accept. Rather, it poses a research opportunity for the future. In summary, the case report by Miller et al.8 adds to the growing recognition of brain-restricted somatic mosaicism as causal to infantile spasms and NAFE. It provides additional evidence connecting the SLC35A2 gene to FCD type 1, thus opening opportunities to study glycosylation pathways in relationship to malformations of cortical development. It is also likely to stimulate future research linking SLC35A2-related genetic defects with the development of structural lesions and their functional manifestations on cellular and network levels.

Study funding

No targeted funding reported.

Disclosure

The author reports no relevant disclosures. Go to Neurology.org/NG for full disclosure.

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/NG for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

  • See page e460

  • Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Perucca P,
    2. Scheffer IE,
    3. Harvey AS, et al
    . Real-world utility of whole exome sequencing with targeted gene analysis for focal epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2017;131:1–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Najm IM,
    2. Sarnat HB,
    3. Blumcke I
    . Review: the international consensus classification of focal cortical dysplasia—a critical update 2018. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2018;44:18–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mirzaa GM,
    2. Campbell CD,
    3. Solovieff N, et al
    . Association of MTOR mutations with developmental brain disorders, including megalencephaly, focal cortical dysplasia, and pigmentary mosaicism. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:836–845.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Iffland PH II.,
    2. Crino PB
    . The role of somatic mutational events in the pathogenesis of epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol 2019;32:191–197.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Vals MA,
    2. Ashikov A,
    3. Ilves P, et al
    . Clinical, neuroradiological, and biochemical features of SLC35A2-CDG patients. J Inherit Metab Dis 2019;42:553–564.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Baldassari S,
    2. Ribierre T,
    3. Marsan E, et al
    . Dissecting the genetic basis of focal cortical dysplasia: a large cohort study. Acta Neuropathol 2019;138:885–900.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Medina-Cano D,
    2. Ucuncu E,
    3. Nguyen LS, et al
    . High N-glycan multiplicity is critical for neuronal adhesion and sensitizes the developing cerebellum to N-glycosylation defect. Elife 2018;7:e38309.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Miller KE,
    2. Koboldt DC,
    3. Schieffer KM, et al
    . Somatic SLC35A2 mosaicism correlates with clinical findings in epilepsy brain tissue. Neurol Genet 2020;6:e460. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000460.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Yuskaitis CJ,
    2. Ruzhnikov MRZ,
    3. Howell KB, et al
    . Infantile spasms of unknown cause: predictors of outcome and genotype-phenotype correlation. Pediatr Neurol 2018;87:48–56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Scott H,
    2. Panin VM
    . The role of protein N-glycosylation in neural transmission. Glycobiology 2014;24:407–417.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Study funding
    • Disclosure
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Preferences and User Experiences of Wearable Devices in Epilepsy A Systematic Review and Mixed-Methods Synthesis

Dr. Daniel Friedman and Dr. Sharon Chiang

► Watch

Related Articles

  • Somatic SLC35A2 mosaicism correlates with clinical findings in epilepsy brain tissue

Topics Discussed

  • All Genetics
  • Epilepsy surgery
  • Infantile spasms
  • Cortical dysplasia

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology Genetics: 9 (2)

Articles

  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Popular Articles

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology: Genetics | Online ISSN: 2376-7839

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise