HSAN-VI

Discovery of neuronal dystonin isoforms

Before the identification of the human disease HSAN-VI,¹³ the dystonin gene and its resulting protein had long since been studied in a murine model known as the dystonia musculorum (Dst^dt) mouse.^17,–,21 In 1963, the Dst^dt mouse that arose by spontaneous mutation at The Jackson Laboratory was first described.^18,21 Severe ataxia and dystonic postures were the major phenotypic characteristics, which were also associated with significant sensory neuron degeneration. Although the underlying genetic mutation was not identified at the time, the disease was predicted to be caused by autosomal recessive mutation. In 1995, 2 separate lines of work led to the identification of the BPAG1/Dst gene as the causative agent for the Dst^dt disease.^20,22 While studying the hemidesmosomal skin protein BPAG1, generation of a BPAG1 knockout mouse unexpectedly produced the ataxic and dystonic phenotype associated with the Dst^dt mouse.²² In parallel, definitive evidence came from cloning experiments identifying the gene that was disrupted by the insertion of an hsp68-LacZ transgene, which resulted in mice bearing the Dst^dt phenotype.^19,20 Ultimately, crossbreeding heterozygous mice from this line and the BPAG1 knockout line onto The Jackson Laboratory Dst^dt line revealed that these mice were allelic, and thus, their mutations mapped to the same genetic locus. This indicated that the gene responsible for producing the BPAG1 skin protein was also responsible for producing the neuronal dystonin protein underlying Dst^dt pathology.^19,23

Subsequent studies would later propose splice variants of neuronal dystonin that were predicted to interact with intermediate filaments (termed BPAG1n), much like how the epithelial isoform dystonin-e interacts with keratin filaments in skin. It was hypothesized that loss of these BPAG1n isoforms was responsible for the neurologic phenotype of the Dst^dt mice.²⁴ However, in 2001, a study evaluating BPAG1 isoform expression in mice found that BPAG1n messenger RNA went completely undetected in neural tissue.¹ This led to the discovery of the larger, more prominently expressed neuronal and muscle isoforms: dystonin-a and dystonin-b, respectively.

In the years to come, these neuronal- and muscle-specific splice variants would also be identified (figure). Elucidating the roles of the neuronal-specific splice variants would become the focus, considering that sensory neurons are the major cell type affected in the Dst^dt mice. However, the major challenge of studying dystonin and its various isoforms lies in the fact that the protein is remarkably large (dystonin-a = 615 kDa, dystonin-b = 834 kDa) and shares high amino acid sequence similarity between the isoforms.^1,25,26 This has made the development of Dst antibodies an incredibly arduous task, and as such, there are currently no reliable isoform-specific antibodies available. Much of what we have learned about the functions of the individual isoforms has come from in vitro experiments using small interfering RNA knockdowns and fusion protein constructs, as well as in vivo examination of the Dst^dt alleles that differ in the nature of their mutations and thus in the isoforms affected.

What the Dst^dt alleles can tell us about HSAN-VI heterogeneity

By comparing the DST mutations identified in the individuals with HSAN-VI, the commonality among the cases is that dystonin-a2 is absent. From what we know through studies on Dst^dt mice and through knockdown experiments on immortalized cells, dystonin-a2 is the most crucial isoform for neuronal functioning since its loss is associated with the most profound and lasting defects to intracellular pathways.^4,25,27,28 We have also observed a moderate rescuing effect when dystonin-a2 is partially restored to neurons in Dst^dt-Tg4 mice, which lack both dystonin-a/b1 and -a/b2.²⁵ These mice have significantly longer lifespans and show improvements in many pathways that are normally defective in the Dst^dt-Tg4 mice.²⁹ The results provided by the Dst^dt mouse experiments strongly suggest that dystonin-a2 is the major determinant for disease. Supportive evidence for this comes from the patients described in the earlier 2017 HSAN-VI study.¹⁴ The affected siblings have a milder form of HSAN-VI that continues into adulthood and is associated with mutations affecting only the neuronal dystonin-a2 isoform (dystonin-b2 is also likely affected, although muscle defects are not primary disease features). It therefore seems highly likely that disrupted expression of dystonin-a2 is both necessary and sufficient to produce HSAN-VI. However, mutations affecting only dystonin-a1 or dystonin-a3 have not been described in humans or in the Dst^dt mouse models, and we therefore do not know to what extent these isoforms contribute to disease etiology. It may be that mutations in either of these isoforms do not result in any major clinical pathology, which could explain the absence in reported cases. In addition, isoform compensation may be a mechanism that could be involved in masking these mutations, as we recently observed this phenomenon in the Dst^dt-Tg4 mice.³⁰ Because these mice retain dystonin-a3, we saw a significant upregulation of this isoform in neural tissues most affected by dystonin loss of function. This upregulation was associated with maintenance of microtubule stability in sensory neurons (a function previously unknown to this isoform), which was reversed on loss of transcript overexpression.³⁰ This pattern of upregulation is consistent with dystonin-a3 compensating for the loss of dystonin-a1 and -a2. Thus, it is reasonable to believe that each of the dystonin-a isoforms possesses the ability to modify its normal function and substitute for an absent or nonfunctional isoform. Nevertheless, future work involving isoform specific knockouts is still needed to conclusively determine the role of each isoform in HSAN-VI pathogenesis.

Seeing as DST mutations can result in a milder form of HSAN-VI expanding into adulthood, HSAN-VI should be recognized as a spectrum disorder whereby severity of the disease may be predicted based on the isoforms affected. Of interest, the Dst^dt−27J mice, which are completely null for all neuronal isoforms of dystonin, present with the most severe phenotype (ataxic affecting all limbs and dystonic postures) and have the shortest lifespan.^26,30 This Dst^dt−27J allele would most closely resemble the first group of very severe patients with HSAN-VI.¹³ The adolescent girl described in the later 2017 HSAN-VI study may be the most severe one among the adult patients with HSAN-VI.¹⁵ Her genotype would mostly resemble Dst^dt-Tg4 or Dst^{Gt(E182H05)Wrst} alleles because she lacks both dystonin-a1 and -a2^26,31 but is haploinsufficient for dystonin-a3. Although her symptoms are not identical to the other adult patients with HSAN-VI, her younger age may indicate that these symptoms are yet to develop. She does, however, have a number of unique symptoms including iris heterochromia, cataracts, syringomyelia from D3-D8, osteoporosis, headaches, and behavioral problems (anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder, and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder), suggesting potential roles for dystonin-a1 and -a2 in these systems. Retention of the dystonin-a/b3 isoforms might also contribute to her longer lifespan compared with the dystonin-a/b null infants. She also experienced skin blistering, which was hypothesized to be because of dystonin-e haploinsufficiency. However, considering the presence of skin ulceration and a lack of dystonin-e isoform involvement in the other adult patients with HSAN-VI, it is likely that her skin blisters are due to peripheral neuropathy leading to skin damage going unnoticed. Furthermore, heterozygous Dst^tm1EFu mice (dystonin knockouts) do not display skin symptoms and have intact hemidesmosomes at the dermoepidermal junction.²² Thus far, the 3 siblings described in the earlier 2017 study likely represent the mildest form of HSAN-VI because they only have dystonin-a2/b2 isoforms affected. With coming age, patients with HSAN-VI may develop new symptoms indicating novel roles of dystonin isoforms that would never have been characterized in the Dst^dt mice due to limitations such as short lifespan and objective measures. As more individuals with DST mutations are identified and as we continue our investigation of affected tissues and mechanisms in the Dst^dt mice, we hope to gain a better understanding of how each isoform contributes to disease.

Moving forward

With the recent identification of adult patients with deleterious DST mutations, it has become clear that HSAN-VI can present on a spectrum based on which neuronal dystonin isoforms are affected. Current evidence indicates that dystonin-a2 is the most important factor dictating development of HSAN-VI. Although to further advance our knowledge of what roles the other neuronal dystonin isoforms play in the development of HSAN-VI, if any, dystonin-a1 and -a3 should be independently assessed. As isoform compensation is a mechanism that potentially modulates disease presentation, expression levels of remaining isoforms should also be evaluated. Although many HSAN-VI symptoms have been accurately predicted by the Dst^dt mice, the short lifespan of these mice is a major limitation for addressing how dystonin loss of function affects adult patients with HSAN-VI. In addition, considering the diverse expression pattern of dystonin-a across tissues, this suggests there are many more roles for the dystonin isoforms that have yet to be characterized. Further evaluation of these patients with HSAN-VI and identification of novel DST mutations will be pivotal in our understanding of the biological roles of the dystonin isoforms and how they relate to pathogenesis.