Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues

User menu

  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology Genetics
Home
A peer-reviewed clinical and translational neurology open access journal
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues

Share

February 2020; 6 (1) ArticleOpen Access

Analysis of FUS, PFN2, TDP-43, and PLS3 as potential disease severity modifiers in spinal muscular atrophy

Renske I. Wadman, Marc D. Jansen, Chantall A.D. Curial, View ORCID ProfileEwout J.N. Groen, Marloes Stam, View ORCID ProfileCamiel A. Wijngaarde, Jelena Medic, Peter Sodaar, Kristel R. van Eijk, Manon M.H. Huibers, Joyce van Kuik, Henny H. Lemmink, Wouter van Rheenen, Jan Herman Veldink, Leonard H. van den Berg, W. Ludo van der Pol
First published January 3, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000000386
Renske I. Wadman
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc D. Jansen
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chantall A.D. Curial
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ewout J.N. Groen
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ewout J.N. Groen
Marloes Stam
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Camiel A. Wijngaarde
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Camiel A. Wijngaarde
Jelena Medic
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Sodaar
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristel R. van Eijk
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manon M.H. Huibers
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joyce van Kuik
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henny H. Lemmink
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wouter van Rheenen
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Herman Veldink
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonard H. van den Berg
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Ludo van der Pol
From the Department of Neurology (R.I.W., M.D.J., C.A.D.C., E.J.N.G., M.S., C.A.W., J.M., P.S., K.R.E., W.R., J.H.V., L.H.B., W.L.P.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Pathology (M.M.H.H., J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Genetics (M.M.H.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht; and Department of Genetics (H.H.L.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Analysis of FUS, PFN2, TDP-43, and PLS3 as potential disease severity modifiers in spinal muscular atrophy
Renske I. Wadman, Marc D. Jansen, Chantall A.D. Curial, Ewout J.N. Groen, Marloes Stam, Camiel A. Wijngaarde, Jelena Medic, Peter Sodaar, Kristel R. van Eijk, Manon M.H. Huibers, Joyce van Kuik, Henny H. Lemmink, Wouter van Rheenen, Jan Herman Veldink, Leonard H. van den Berg, W. Ludo van der Pol
Neurol Genet Feb 2020, 6 (1) e386; DOI: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000386

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
368

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective To investigate mutations in genes that are potential modifiers of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) severity.

Methods We performed a hypothesis-based search into the presence of variants in fused in sarcoma (FUS), transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), plastin 3 (PLS3), and profilin 2 (PFN2) in a cohort of 153 patients with SMA types 1–4, including 19 families. Variants were detected with targeted next-generation sequencing and confirmed with Sanger sequencing. Functional effects of the identified variants were analyzed in silico and for PLS3, by analyzing expression levels in peripheral blood.

Results We identified 2 exonic variants in FUS exons 5 and 6 (p.R216C and p.S135N) in 2 unrelated patients, but clinical effects were not evident. We identified 8 intronic variants in PLS3 in 33 patients. Five PLS3 variants (c.1511+82T>C; c.748+130 G>A; c.367+182C>T; c.891-25T>C (rs145269469); c.1355+17A>G (rs150802596)) potentially alter exonic splice silencer or exonic splice enhancer sites. The variant c.367+182C>T, but not RNA expression levels, corresponded with a more severe phenotype in 1 family. However, this variant or level of PLS3 expression did not consistently correspond with a milder or more severe phenotype in other families or the overall cohort. We found 3 heterozygous, intronic variants in PFN2 and TDP-43 with no correlation with clinical phenotype or effects on splicing.

Conclusions PLS3 and FUS sequence variants do not modify SMA severity at the population level. Specific variants in individual patients or families do not consistently correlate with disease severity.

Glossary

ESE=
exonic splice enhancer;
ESS=
exonic splice silencer;
FUS=
fused in sarcoma;
PFN2=
profilin 2;
PLS3=
plastin 3;
SMA=
spinal muscular atrophy;
SMN=
survival motor neuron;
TDP-43=
transactive response DNA-binding protein 43

Proximal hereditary spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by homozygous deletion or mutation in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene, combined with the presence of a variable number of copies of a related gene, SMN2.1 SMA has a striking spectrum of severity, ranging from severe antenatal to mild adult onset motor deficits. This variation is reflected by the widely used classification system that distinguishes types 0/1a - 4, based on the age at onset and the higher of 2 acquired motor milestones (e.g., sitting and walking independently).2

The backup SMN2 gene determines residual SMN protein levels in cells.3,9,41 The SMN protein has multiple functions, including messenger RNA (mRNA) and ubiquitin homeostasis,4,5 axonal transport,6,7 and endocytosis.8 Differences in SMA severity are primarily explained by variation in copy numbers of SMN2, but still 20%–40% of the clinical variability does not correspond with the SMN2 copy number.9,10 SMN2 point mutations, in particular c.859G>C,11 and possible epigenetic variation12 have been identified as additional severity modifying factors by changing amino acids, disrupting exonic splice enhancer (ESE) or exonic splice silencer (ESS), or altering expression of SMN in other ways. However, none of these intragenic SMN2 modifiers explain the full range of severity in SMA. It is therefore likely that there are additional modifiers of disease severity outside the SMN2 gene.10,13 Candidates include genes encoding proteins that interact with SMN in complexes or that have been shown to rescue SMN-dependent downstream cellular functions. For example, mutations in fused in sarcoma (FUS) can disrupt the axonal distribution pattern of SMN and were found to be associated with lower motor neuron syndromes.14 Moreover, transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is a major constituent of pathologic ubiquitinated protein aggregates in target tissues of patients with sporadic (lower) motor neuron disease.15,16 In addition, profilin 2 (PFN2) is important for preservation of cytoskeletal integrity and neuritogenesis.17,18 Of interest, each of these genes has also been implicated in other types of motor neuron disease and therefore provide possible functional links between SMA and other motor neuron diseases.15,16,19,–,21

The plastin 3 (PLS3) gene has been mapped to chromosome Xq23 and encodes an actin-binding protein.13 Although PLS3 probably does not directly interact with SMN, it represents an additional SMA severity modifying candidate gene because its overexpression was found in asymptomatic women with a homozygous SMN1 deletion who had male relatives with SMA type 3.13 Although the genetic background of PLS3 overexpression in individuals is unclear, PLS3 overexpression in experimental models for SMN deficiency reversed defects in axonogenesis and endocytosis.8,13,22

The incidence and effect of variation in these potential modifying genes in patients with SMA have not yet been explored in detail. Identification of these modifiers will help to dissect cellular processes and pathways that are affected by SMN deficiency and that may represent further therapeutic targets for SMA. We therefore investigated the presence of single nucleotide variants in PLS3, FUS, TDP-43, and PFN2 in a cohort of 153 patients with SMA types 1–4 to explore their potential role as SMA severity modifying genes. We included 19 families, 11 of which had sibs with differing degrees of severity.

Methods

We enrolled patients with SMA types 1–4 between September 2010 and August 2014. Methods are described in appendix e-1 (links.lww.com/NXG/A203).

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents

The Medical Ethical Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht approved the study protocol. This study was registered at the Dutch registry for clinical studies and trials (ccmo-online.nl).

Data availability

Anonymized data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Results

Patients

We included 153 patients. Characteristics of the participants are summarized in table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

Patient characteristics

All but 1 patient had homozygous deletion of at least exon 7 of SMN1. One patient had a heterozygous deletion of SMN1 and a point mutation in exon 4 (c.542A>G), which created a new splice-donor site within exon 4 of SMN1 and an out-of-frame transcript (i.e., null allele).

Forty-two patients had a discordant phenotype (16 SMA type 1 with 3 or 4 SMN2 copies; 8 SMA type 2 with 2 or 4 SMN2 copies; 21 SMA type 3 with 3 or 5 SMN2 copies). Two patients with a discordant phenotype of SMA type 2 and only 2 SMN2 copies harbored the c.859G>C mutation in SMN2 exon 7.11

We included 19 families encompassing a total of 35 siblings and first-degree relatives. Eleven (58%) families, including 26 siblings and first-degree cousins, were discordant (e.g., brother with SMA type 3a and sister with SMA type 2b), despite similar SMN2 copy numbers in 17 of the 19 families (90%).

Variation in sequences of FUS, PFN2, TDP-43, and PLS3

We identified 2 exonic variants in FUS, 8 intronic variants in PLS3, 2 intronic variants in PFN2, and 1 intronic variant in TDP-43. The full list of sequence variations in FUS, PFN2, PLS3, and TDP-43 is provided in the supplementary file (table e-1, links.lww.com/NXG/A202).

Variation in coding sequences of FUS

We identified 2 different heterozygous missense sequence variants in FUS in 2 unrelated patients (table 2) and no intronic variants. One patient carried a mutation in FUS exon 6 (c.646C>T; p.R216C) that is predicted to be damaging (PolyPhen-2 score 0.997; sensitivity 0.41; specificity 0.98). This variant has been reported previously in patients with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) with a lower motor neuron phenotype21,23 and patients with familial essential tremor.24 This patient has SMA type 1c and has 3 SMN2 copies. Disease course did not differ from what was expected in SMA type 1c with 3 SMN2 copies. Age at onset was 4 months, when she lost the ability to lift her head in prone position. She has never acquired the ability to roll over or sit without support. At the time of inclusion, she was aged 13 years and still without respiratory support, despite episodes of pneumonia. This patient had a postural tremor that was not more pronounced than in other patients with SMA types 1c or 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2

Characteristics of 2 nonrelated patients with exonic variants in FUS

We identified another FUS variant in exon 5 (c.404G>A; p.S135N). This FUS variant has not been reported before and is predicted to be benign (PolyPhen-2 score 0.004; sensitivity 0.97, specificity 0.59). At the time of inclusion, the patient was aged 19.5 years, and disease course did not differ from what was expected in SMA type 2a. Disease onset was at 6 months, and she carried 3 SMN2 copies. She started with noninvasive respiratory support at age 12 years. Her elder brother, aged 22.5 years at the time of inclusion, also carried 3 SMN2 copies but lacked the variant in FUS. He had an SMA type 2b phenotype reaching an additional motor milestone, i.e., standing with support, and did not need respiratory support at age 26 years (last follow-up).

Genetic variation in PFN2 and TDP-43

No exonic variants could be confirmed in PFN2 or TDP-43. We identified 3 heterozygous, intronic variants in PFN2 and TDP-43 (table e-1, links.lww.com/NXG/A202). The A/C variant in intron 2 of PFN2 is located in an ESS, although none of the variants were predicted to alter splicing (HumanSpliceFinder).

Variation in intronic sequences and expression levels of PLS3

We identified a total of 8 intronic variants in PLS3 (table e-1, links.lww.com/NXG/A202) but no exonic or coding variants. We found 5 variants in 26 patients, affecting ESS sites (c.748+130G>A; c.891-25TC (rs145269469); c.1377+17A>G (rs150802596); c.1511+82T>C) or creating new ESE sites (c.367+182C>T; c.1511+82T>C; c.891-25T>C (rs145269469)) (figure 1). The c.1511+82T>C variant occurred in 4 patients, 3 of whom carried a second variant (c.1511+82T>C and c.367+182C>T). None of these sites was predicted to have an effect on splicing (HumanSpliceFinder), although the functional effect of each variant on ESS/ESE would remain to be determined. Minor allele frequency was between 0.006 and 0.040 in all variants (Project MinE databrowser, gnomAD, ExAC).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 Reads of variants in PLS3

Results showing reverse reads of Sanger sequencing genomic DNA. (A) Heterozygous variant in intron 3 (c.367+182 C>T) in a female patient. (B) No variant in sequence of the brother, who has a milder phenotype. (C) Control with wild-type sequence.

To analyze potential effects of these variants on PLS3 expression levels, we performed expression analysis in blood of patients for which RNA had been collected. Expression analysis was performed in 50 patients and 21 healthy controls (table 1). Healthy controls (median age 68 years [range 38–78 years]) included 6 females (29%). Expression levels of PLS3 ranged from 1.4–26.0 copies/ng copyDNA (cDNA) (median 10.6, mean 10.8). Expression levels did not differ between patients and controls (p = 0.6; median level in patients: 10.2 copies/ng cDNA [range 1.7–26.0 copies/ng cDNA]; median level in controls: 12.2 copies/ng cDNA [range 1.4–18.0 copies/ng cDNA]), nor between males and females (controls p = 0.8; patients with SMA p = 0.9) (figure 2A). In patients, PLS3 expression levels correlated with age in males (n = 24) (Spearman rho −0.44; p = 0.03), but not in females (n = 26) (Spearman rho −0.17, p = 0.41). There was no correlation between PLS3 levels and the SMN2 copy number (p = 0.32).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2 Expression levels of PLS3

Results showing expression levels of PLS3 and the effects of (A) sex in patients and controls and (B) different intronic variants in the PLS3 gene. Expression levels of PLS3 are expressed in copies per nanogram cDNA. TBP and HRPT1 were both used as references. Variant status of the included controls is unknown. (A) Sex did not consistently affect expression levels in patients or controls (p = 0.5). Expression levels of PLS3 did not differ between patients and controls (p = 0.6) or SMA types (p = 0.4). (B) Patients are reflected by diamond (male) or bullet (female) with color representing SMA type. Variants in intron 3 (c.367+182C>T) result in higher levels of PLS3 (p = 0.04; median expression levels of PLS3 in patients and controls 10.8 copies per nanogram cDNA (range 1.4–26.0 copies per nanogram cDNA); median expression in intron 3 altered patients 19.1 copies per nanogram cDNA (range 12.1–23.0 copies per nanogram cDNA). Two siblings of a family carrying the c.367+182C>T variant showed a more severe phenotype (type 2b) in the sibling carrying the variant compared with the sibling who did not carry the variant (type 3a). The expression levels of PLS3 were only available from the sibling with the variant (marked by “X”). Another family carrying this variant included 2 siblings and their cousin, all carrying the same variant, but having different SMA types (type 3a [siblings] and type 2a [cousin]). The siblings had similar expression levels of PLS3 (marked by “*”). PLS3 expression level in the cousin was not available. cDNA= copy DNA; SMA = spinal muscular atrophy.

Expression levels in patients carrying the variant in intron 3 (c.367+182C>T) were higher compared with patients not carrying the variant (figure 2B) (p = 0.04), possibly indicating a functional effect of this variant as a novel ESE. Other variants were not associated with expression changes. We could not perform expression analysis in patients with the c.1511+82T>C variant because RNA was not available.

PLS3 genotype and expression levels in relation to clinical phenotypes

Nineteen nonrelated patients carried 1 of the 5 identified intronic variants in PLS3 affecting an ESE or ESS. The presence of one of the PLS3 variants was not associated with a milder or more severe phenotype in these patients compared with patients without a variant (p > 0.05). Six of 27 patients with a discordant phenotype carried an intronic mutation in PLS3, but the presence of a mutation did not correlate with a positive or negative discordant phenotype (all mutations p adjusted > 0.05). PLS3 expression levels did not correlate with clinical severity, e.g., SMA type (p = 0.15).

Combined analysis of PLS3 sequences and PLS3 expression analysis was possible in all siblings of 3 families and 7 nonrelated patients (figure 2). Expression levels of PLS3 were not associated with milder or more severe clinical phenotypes (p = 0.53; figure 2B.)

In 1 family, the presence of the c.367+182C>T variant corresponded with a more severe phenotype or disease course compared with the sibling not carrying the variant (type 2b vs 3a), whereas in another family, the variant was present in the sibling with a milder phenotype (type 2b vs 1c) (figure 2). In the third family carrying this variant, there was no clear effect of the variant. The siblings had SMA type 3a in line with 4 SMN2 copies, whereas their cousin had a more severe phenotype (type 2a), which corresponded with his 3 SMN2 copy background. In conclusion, these findings suggest that variability in PLS3 sequence and RNA expression does not sufficiently explain discordant severity in our patient cohort.

Discussion

We performed a hypothesis-based mutational analysis of the candidate disease-modifying genes PLS3, TDP-43, PFN2, and FUS to explore their potential contribution to variability in severity of SMA. We found no evidence for genetic association between variation in these candidate genes and SMA severity, although we identified specific variants in FUS and PLS3 that may be of interest in specific cases. Our findings suggest that other genetic modifiers, both near the SMN locus and elsewhere in the genome, are likely to exist that modify SMA disease severity.

Mutations in FUS exons 5 and 6 have been reported previously in patients with lower motor neuron diseases.21,23,25,26 More specifically, the p.R216C mutation was previously described in patients with sporadic ALS or patients with essential tremor.21,24 The p.S135N variant has not been described before, and it appears unlikely that this variant is damaging, although the functionality of this particular region of FUS is unknown.25,26 FUS and SMN proteins are known to interact and are both involved in RNA processing.14 Of interest, deleterious effects of FUS mutations, e.g., dysfunctional axonal growth and branching defects, can be rescued by overexpression of SMN.14 The p.R216C mutation may negatively affect FUS expression or the interaction with SMN and thereby further reduce the functionality of the SMN-FUS complex.21 Partial penetrance of FUS mutations has been shown by noncomplete disease segregation in familial ALS.25 However, because the SMN2 copy number of our patient harboring the p.R216C mutation was in line with the clinical phenotype, the effect of the FUS variant cannot at present be further speculated on.

We did not find coding variants in PFN2 in our cohort of patients. The SMN/PFN2a interaction has been confirmed by previous in vivo studies27 showing alternating levels of PFN2a and SMN to effect SMA phenotype in mice. Previous studies showed that minimal changes in protein levels of either SMN or PFN2 altered their interaction and the downstream RhoA/ROCK pathway and affected neuritogenesis.27 Although we did not find variants in PFN2, the fact that heterozygous deletions of SMN1 with point mutations in exon 5 containing the binding site for profilin28,–,32 results in an SMA phenotype supports the importance of the SMN/PFN2a interaction. Second, mutations in other profilins (like profilin-1) contribute to the risk of ALS,19 but because of variable penetrance of the mutations,19,20 it is as yet unclear whether such mutations are a direct cause or a risk factor for the development of motor neuron disease.

The modifying effect of PLS3 overexpression on SMA phenotype was first suggested by the finding of high PLS3 expression in lymphoblast cells from peripheral blood in a family with asymptomatic or mildly affected females with a homozygous SMN1 deletion.13,33,34 Studies in SMA mice and zebrafish supported the role of PLS3 overexpression as shown by the rescue of motor axon defects,22,35,36 improvement of neuromuscular junction alterations,8,22,35 and prolongation of survival.8,37 Other reports showed conflicting results, which may suggest that PLS3 only acts as a modifier in specific families or genetic backgrounds.10,33,34,38,–,40 We identified 5 intronic variants in PLS3 that alter splice sites and may thereby modify clinical severity. Because the severity of modifying effects of PLS3 has been linked to high expression levels, we first studied the relation between these variants and expression, followed by comparison of severity in patients with and without PLS3 variants. One of the challenges of PLS3 expression analysis is the low expression levels in blood, which has also been reported by other groups.38,39 We used a sensitive droplet digital PCR technique that requires only small amounts of blood to overcome this issue, but we cannot exclude the possibility that even this technique lacks the sensitivity to detect biologically relevant differences in PLS3 expression, at least in blood. An alternative approach, for example, the use of fibroblasts rather than blood was not possible. PLS3 expression levels were higher in patients with intron 3 (c.367+182C>T) variant, but not in any of the other variants. We have analyzed full-length PLS3 transcripts as described previously,13 although this approach precludes the analysis of correlations between specific mutations and alternative (unknown) isoforms of PLS3 and might therefore have resulted in the lack of correlation between phenotype and expression levels. A further comparison of severity between patients with and without PLS3 variants did not show a consistent correlation with disease severity, with the notable exception of 1 family, where the intron 3 (c.367+182C>T) variation coincided with a more severe rather than a milder disease course. This finding is clearly not in line with the presumed protective effect of higher PLS3 expression levels. Combined, our data suggest that specific rare variants in PLS3 may alter expression levels, but the effect on the clinical phenotype remains unclear.

In the current study, we chose to study a small number of candidate genes in high detail. Because we used targeted next-generation sequencing analysis in our initial screen for variants, we may have missed individual mutational changes that cannot be detected by the designed amplicons. Moreover, genetic variants further up- or downstream of our candidate genes are not included in the current study but may be required to further explain variation in e.g., PLS3 RNA expression. Common variants near modifying genes might affect clinical severity, but were not explored in this study. Whole-genome sequencing approaches might aid in the discovery of other disease-modifying variants, although the identification of predictors for individual patients or small numbers of patients might be complicated by a lack of statistical power that these kind of studies generally require.

The identification and registration of the present (dis)cordant families with multiple affected siblings or first- or second-degree relatives is essential in the identification of possible disease severity modifiers, especially now that such families will become increasingly rare due to the introduction of presymptomatic treatment strategies, prenatal screening, or even preimplantation selection. Larger studies through international collaborative efforts in search for genetic modifiers are needed, especially now that genetic modifiers such as SMN2 have become potent targets for therapeutic strategies and may help to identify those who benefit most from these intensive therapies.

Study funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds (WAR08-24).

Disclosure

Disclosures available: Neurology.org/NG.

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the patients and families who participated in this study and to the Dutch patient organization for neuromuscular diseases (Spierziekten Nederland) that supported its initiation and execution.

Appendix Authors

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/NG for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

  • ↵* R.I. Wadman and M.D. Jansen contributed equally to the manuscript.

  • The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.

  • Received June 11, 2019.
  • Accepted in final form November 4, 2019.
  • Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lefebvre S,
    2. Burglen L,
    3. Reboullet S, et al
    . Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell 1995;80:155–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mercuri E,
    2. Bertini E,
    3. Iannaccone ST
    . Childhood spinal muscular atrophy: controversies and challenges. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:443–452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lefebvre S,
    2. Burlet P,
    3. Liu Q, et al
    . Correlation between severity and SMN protein level in spinal muscular atrophy. Nat Genet 1997;16:265–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wishart TM,
    2. Mutsaers CA,
    3. Riessland M, et al
    . Dysregulation of ubiquitin homeostasis and beta-catenin signaling promote spinal muscular atrophy. J Clin Invest 2014;124:1821–1834.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Burghes AH,
    2. Beattie CE
    . Spinal muscular atrophy: why do low levels of survival motor neuron protein make motor neurons sick? Nat Rev Neurosci 2009;10:597–609.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Rossoll W,
    2. Jablonka S,
    3. Andreassi C, et al
    . Smn, the spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene product, modulates axon growth and localization of beta-actin mRNA in growth cones of motoneurons. J Cell Biol 2003;163:801–812.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. McWhorter ML,
    2. Monani UR,
    3. Burghes AH,
    4. Beattie CE
    . Knockdown of the survival motor neuron (Smn) protein in zebrafish causes defects in motor axon outgrowth and pathfinding. J Cell Biol 2003;162:919–931.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hosseinibarkooie S,
    2. Peters M,
    3. Torres-Benito L, et al
    . The power of human protective modifiers: PLS3 and CORO1C unravel impaired endocytosis in spinal muscular atrophy and rescue SMA phenotype. Am J Hum Genet 2016;99:647–665.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Calucho M,
    2. Bernal S,
    3. Alias L, et al
    . Correlation between SMA type and SMN2 copy number revisited: an analysis of 625 unrelated Spanish patients and a compilation of 2834 reported cases. Neuromuscul Disord 2018;28:208–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ruhno C,
    2. McGovern VL,
    3. Avenarius MR, et al
    . Complete sequencing of the SMN2 gene in SMA patients detects SMN gene deletion junctions and variants in SMN2 that modify the SMA phenotype. Hum Genet 2019;138:241–256.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Prior TW,
    2. Krainer AR,
    3. Hua Y, et al
    . A positive modifier of spinal muscular atrophy in the SMN2 gene. Am J Hum Genet 2009;85:408–413.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hauke J,
    2. Riessland M,
    3. Lunke S, et al
    . Survival motor neuron gene 2 silencing by DNA methylation correlates with spinal muscular atrophy disease severity and can be bypassed by histone deacetylase inhibition. Hum Mol Genet 2009;18:304–317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Oprea GE,
    2. Krober S,
    3. McWhorter ML, et al
    . Plastin 3 is a protective modifier of autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy. Science 2008;320:524–527.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Groen EJ,
    2. Fumoto K,
    3. Blokhuis AM, et al
    . ALS-associated mutations in FUS disrupt the axonal distribution and function of SMN. Hum Mol Genet 2013;22:3690–3704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kapeli K,
    2. Pratt GA,
    3. Vu AQ, et al
    . Distinct and shared functions of ALS-associated proteins TDP-43, FUS and TAF15 revealed by multisystem analyses. Nat Commun 2016;7:12143.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Tanaka Y,
    2. Hasegawa M
    . Profilin 1 mutants form aggregates that induce accumulation of prion-like TDP-43. Prion 2016;10:283–289.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Bowerman M,
    2. Anderson CL,
    3. Beauvais A,
    4. Boyl PP,
    5. Witke W,
    6. Kothary R
    . SMN, profilin IIa and plastin 3: a link between the deregulation of actin dynamics and SMA pathogenesis. Mol Cell Neurosci 2009;42:66–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Nolle A,
    2. Zeug A,
    3. van Bergeijk J, et al
    . The spinal muscular atrophy disease protein SMN is linked to the Rho-kinase pathway via profilin. Hum Mol Genet 2011;20:4865–4878.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Wu CH,
    2. Fallini C,
    3. Ticozzi N, et al
    . Mutations in the profilin 1 gene cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature 2012;488:499–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Fratta P,
    2. Charnock J,
    3. Collins T, et al
    . Profilin1 E117G is a moderate risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:506–508.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Corrado L,
    2. Del Bo R,
    3. Castellotti B, et al
    . Mutations of FUS gene in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Genet 2010;47:190–194.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Ackermann B,
    2. Krober S,
    3. Torres-Benito L, et al
    . Plastin 3 ameliorates spinal muscular atrophy via delayed axon pruning and improves neuromuscular junction functionality. Hum Mol Genet 2013;22:1328–1347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kwiatkowski TJ Jr.,
    2. Bosco DA,
    3. Leclerc AL, et al
    . Mutations in the FUS/TLS gene on chromosome 16 cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 2009;323:1205–1208.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Merner ND,
    2. Girard SL,
    3. Catoire H, et al
    . Exome sequencing identifies FUS mutations as a cause of essential tremor. Am J Hum Genet 2012;91:313–319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Yan J,
    2. Deng HX,
    3. Siddique N, et al
    . Frameshift and novel mutations in FUS in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and ALS/dementia. Neurology 2010;75:807–814.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ticozzi N,
    2. Silani V,
    3. LeClerc AL, et al
    . Analysis of FUS gene mutation in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis within an Italian cohort. Neurology 2009;73:1180–1185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hensel N,
    2. Claus P
    . The actin cytoskeleton in SMA and ALS: how does it contribute to motoneuron degeneration? Neuroscientist 2018;24:54–72.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Jedrzejowska M,
    2. Gos M,
    3. Zimowski JG,
    4. Kostera-Pruszczyk A,
    5. Ryniewicz B,
    6. Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I
    . Novel point mutations in survival motor neuron 1 gene expand the spectrum of phenotypes observed in spinal muscular atrophy patients. Neuromuscul Disord 2014;24:617–623.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Wirth B,
    2. Herz M,
    3. Wetter A, et al
    . Quantitative analysis of survival motor neuron copies: identification of subtle SMN1 mutations in patients with spinal muscular atrophy, genotype-phenotype correlation, and implications for genetic counseling. Am J Hum Genet 1999;64:1340–1356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Tsai CH,
    2. Jong YJ,
    3. Hu CJ, et al
    . Molecular analysis of SMN, NAIP and P44 genes of SMA patients and their families. J Neurol Sci 2001;190:35–40.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Yang L,
    2. Cao YY,
    3. Qu YJ, et al
    . Sanger sequencing for the diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy patients with survival motor neuron gene 1 compound heterozygous mutation [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2017;97:418–423.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Du J,
    2. Qu YJ,
    3. Xiong H, et al
    . Mutation analysis of SMN1 gene in patients with spinal muscular atrophy [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2011;49:411–415.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Yanyan C,
    2. Yujin Q,
    3. Jinli B,
    4. Yuwei J,
    5. Hong W,
    6. Fang S
    . Correlation of PLS3 expression with disease severity in children with spinal muscular atrophy. J Hum Genet 2014;59:24–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Stratigopoulos G,
    2. Lanzano P,
    3. Deng L, et al
    . Association of plastin 3 expression with disease severity in spinal muscular atrophy only in postpubertal females. Arch Neurol 2010;67:1252–1256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Hao le T,
    2. Wolman M,
    3. Granato M,
    4. Beattie CE
    . Survival motor neuron affects plastin 3 protein levels leading to motor defects. J Neurosci 2012;32:5074–5084.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Lyon AN,
    2. Pineda RH,
    3. Hao le T,
    4. Kudryashova E,
    5. Kudryashov DS,
    6. Beattie CE
    . Calcium binding is essential for plastin 3 function in Smn-deficient motoneurons. Hum Mol Genet 2014;23:1990–2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Kaifer KA,
    2. Villalon E,
    3. Osman EY, et al
    . Plastin-3 extends survival and reduces severity in mouse models of spinal muscular atrophy. JCI Insight 2017;2:e89970.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Boza-Moran MG,
    2. Martinez-Hernandez R,
    3. Bernal S, et al
    . Decay in survival motor neuron and plastin 3 levels during differentiation of iPSC-derived human motor neurons. Sci Rep 2015;5:11696.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    1. Bernal S,
    2. Also-Rallo E,
    3. Martinez-Hernandez R, et al
    . Plastin 3 expression in discordant spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) siblings. Neuromuscul Disord 2011;21:413–419.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. McGovern VL,
    2. Massoni-Laporte A,
    3. Wang X, et al
    . Plastin 3 expression does not modify spinal muscular atrophy severity in the 7 SMA mouse. PLoS One 2015;10:e0132364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Coovert DD,
    2. Le TT,
    3. McAndrew PE, et al
    . The survival motor neuron protein in spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mol Genet 1997;6:1205–1214.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

NOTE: All contributors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.ng.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.

  • Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • 200 words maximum.
  • 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Letters

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Letters Submission Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Glossary
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Study funding
    • Disclosure
    • Acknowledgment
    • Appendix Authors
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • Anterior nerve cell disease
  • Gene expression studies
  • Association studies in genetics

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Advertisement
Neurology Genetics: 7 (2)

Articles

  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Popular Articles

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology: Genetics | Online ISSN: 2376-7839

© 2021 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise