Novel intronic mutation in MTM1 detected by RNA analysis in a case of X-linked myotubular myopathy
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM) is a rare neuromuscular condition that presents with neonatal hypotonia and weakness and is associated with severe morbidities (including wheelchair, feeding tube, and ventilator dependence) and early death.1 It is defined by muscle biopsy features, including central nuclei, abnormal oxidative stain distribution, and type I fiber hypotrophy.2 Mutations in myotubularin (MTM1) account for all genetically solved cases of XLMTM, but have not been discovered in all individuals with characteristic clinical and biopsy features.3 Of note, there are some forms of autosomal centronuclear myopathy that can resemble XLMTM, such as those associated with mutations in BIN1, DNM2, RYR1, and SPEG, although rarely are such cases a complete phenocopy of XLMTM.4 In this study, we present a case that illustrates the importance of considering noncoding mutations as a cause of XLMTM and illustrate the utility of RNA analysis in individuals with a phenotype suggestive of a particular genetic diagnosis.
The proband is a 27-year-old man with severe generalized weakness and prominent disease morbidities, including wheelchair, feeding tube, and ventilator dependence. The family history was unremarkable for neuromuscular disorders. He was born at term from a healthy mother after a pregnancy complicated by diminished fetal movements. He was noted at birth to be weak and hypotonic, although he did not require invasive respiratory support as a neonate. He had multiple episodes of respiratory failure that resulted in repeated hospitalizations, and at age 6.5 years underwent tracheostomy and thereafter required continuous ventilatory support. He achieved the ability to walk independently at age 30 months and lost the ability at 48 months after prolonged hospitalization for a respiratory infection. Since that time, he has been supported by wheelchair. He is able to eat independently, although he has difficulties with chewing and swallowing. Physical examination is notable for myopathic facies, ptosis, ophthalmoparesis, head circumference greater than the 90th percentile, diffuse extremity weakness, and long fingers, a combination of clinical features highly suggestive of a mutation in MTM1.1
Diagnostic muscle biopsy performed at age 11 months showed the classic features of an XLMTM (figure, A); thus, he was presumptively diagnosed with the condition. However, genetic testing of MTM1, accomplished on a next-generation sequencing–based panel of 17 genes implicated in congenital myopathy (including all exons plus 10 base pairs of surrounding intronic sequence as performed at the University of Chicago), did not reveal a mutation, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MPLA) testing for deletion/duplication of these genes was also normal.
(A) Hematoxylin & eosin and succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) staining of the patient's muscle biopsy showing the classic features of centronuclear myopathy, including myofiber hypotrophy, central nuclei, and aggregation of oxidative material; (B) RT-PCR of amplicon 1 (F1, spanning exons 2–8) on RNA from patient fibroblasts revealing an abnormal transcript of 567 bp (exon 5 skipping) and 472 bp (exons 4 and 5 skipping) compared with control 678 bp; (C) Western blot of myotubularin (MTM1) protein from patient (Pt) and control (Ctrl) fibroblasts (65 kDa normal band) revealing that MTM1 is almost not detectable in the patient (actin for loading control); (D) DNA chromatogram of the hemizygous c. 232-26_232-23 deletion in intron 4 of MTM1 gene; (E) Schematic diagram of the MTM1 mutation and its position within a branch point site. (F) Schematic depicting the consequences of the branch point mutation on RNA processing of MTM1 (i.e., skipping of exon 5 or of exons 4 and 5) as determined by RT-PCR (B). (G) Validation of exon 5 skipping as revealed in the chromatogram from Sanger sequencing of the middle band (*) identified by RT-PCR. Sequence analysis confirms the loss of exon 5 sequence. cDNA = complementary DNA; RT-PCR = reverse transcription PCR.
Given the high suspicion of XLMTM, we investigated MTM1 transcript and protein from the proband's skin fibroblasts. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) analysis using sets of overlapping exonic primers identified abnormalities in the MTM1 transcript including primarily deletion of exon 5 (figure, B and C). Western blot analysis showed reduction of full-length MTM1 protein and the presence of a smaller molecular weight fragment (figure, D). Genomic DNA Sanger sequencing of intron 4 revealed a previously unreported 4 base pair deletion (c.232-26_232-23delGACT), 23 base pairs from the splice acceptor junction (figure, E). In silico analysis predicted that this mutation interrupts the splice branch point, the consequence of which is skipping of exon 5 (figure, F and G). In all, these data confirm this as a case of XLMTM due to a novel intronic mutation that was detected by RNA analysis in vitro.
This case is instructive for several reasons. First, it adds to the growing list of noncoding mutations identified as causes of rare mendelian disorders. Given the estimate that approximately 50% of all neurogenetic diseases are not solved by exome sequencing or gene panels, cases such as ours support a hypothesis that many of these unsolved cases are the result of intronic or regulatory sequence mutations.5 Second, the case illustrates the utility of RNA analysis as a means of identifying such mutations. In settings like this one of a high index of suspicion for a specific genetic cause, RT-PCR is an easy modality for interrogating transcripts. However, when mutations in many genes may be responsible for a given phenotype, large-scale transcriptome analysis using RNA sequencing is an effective methodology.5,6 Last, the case identifies an unexpected shortcoming of gene panels and exome sequencing; unlike Sanger sequencing, to enable cost-effective screening of many exons, these technologies use short primers that are typically within 10 base pairs of the exon, and thus miss out on noncoding mutations outside the immediate splice region. This is particularly relevant for splice lariat mutations (as in our situation), as the branch point is typically 20–40 base pairs from the intron boundary. Of note, the milder phenotype of our patient may be explained by our observation of a faint amount of full-length MTM1 transcript and protein, and/or by the fact that his MTM1 mutation produces exon 5 skipping, the consequence of which is an in-frame deletion and predicted production of a truncated protein.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Etsuko Tsuchiya for assistance for REB and Valerion Therapeutics for support of longitudinal natural history study.
Footnotes
Author contributions: Dr. Al-Hashim: study concept and design, data acquisition, and writing of manuscript. Dr. Gonorazky and Ms. Amburgey: data acquisition and interpretation and critical revision of manuscript. Dr. Das: data interpretation and critical revision of manuscript for intellectual content. Dr. Dowling: study concept and design, study supervision, acquisition and interpretation of data, and writing and critical revision of manuscript for intellectual content.
Study funding: Study funded by the Department of Paediatrics Start-up Fund at the Hospital for Sick Children. Study participant seen as part of an ongoing longitudinal natural history study funded by Valerion Therapeutics.
Disclosure: A. Al-Hashim, H. Gonorazky, K. Amburgey, and S. Das report no disclosures. J.J. Dowling serves on the scientific advisory boards of the RYR1 Foundation, the MTM/CNM patient registry, and the World Muscle Society; has received donations to SickKids Foundation, Where There's a Will Foundation, and Joshua Frase Foundation; has received travel funding from Audentes; has served on the editorial boards of Muscle & Nerve, PLoS Currents: Muscular Dystrophy, Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases, Neuromuscular Disorders, and Disease Models & Mechanisms; has been a consultant for Guidepoint Global Advisors and GLG Group; and has received research funding from Valerion Therapeutics, CIHR, NIH, NSERC, Genome Canada, Hospital for Sick Children, Cure CMD, Joshua Frase Foundation, Team Joseph, Myotubular Trust, and Muscular Dystrophy Association. Go to Neurology.org/ng for full disclosure forms. The Article Processing Charge was funded by Genome Canada.
- Received May 11, 2017.
- Accepted in final form July 11, 2017.
- Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
References
- 1.↵
- Pagon RA,
- Adam MP,
- Ardinger HH, et al.
- Das S,
- Dowling J,
- Pierson CR
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- Cummings BB,
- Marshall JL,
- Tukiainen T, et al
- 6.↵
- Gonorazky H,
- Liang M,
- Cummings B, et al
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All contributors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.ng.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.